BeautyStrong Grape Flavor [Discontinued] by BeautyFit

EFFECTIVE

• Dyspepsia. Oral calcium carbonate is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as an antacid. Details: Taking calcium carbonate orally as an antacid is effective for treating dyspepsia (1843). Calcium carbonate has FDA approval as an antacid.
• Hyperkalemia. Intravenous calcium gluconate is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for preventing hyperkalemia-induced cardiac abnormalities. Details: Administering calcium gluconate intravenously can reverse electrocardiographic changes and arrhythmias induced by hyperkalemia (12946). Intravenous calcium gluconate is FDA-approved for preventing hyperkalemia-induced cardiac abnormalities.
• Hypocalcemia. Oral calcium treats and prevents hypocalcemia. Intravenous calcium is used to treat severe hypocalcemia. Details: Taking calcium orally is effective for treating and preventing hypocalcemia. Intravenous calcium gluconate, acetate, gluceptate, or chloride is effective for severe hypocalcemia or hypocalcemic tetany (12928).
• Kidney failure. Oral calcium carbonate or calcium acetate is used as a phosphate binder during kidney failure. Details: Taking calcium carbonate or calcium acetate orally is effective as a phosphate binder. Calcium acetate (PhosLo) appears to control hyperphosphatemia better than sevelamer (Renagel) (12943,12944,38990). Calcium citrate is not recommended for this purpose because it increases aluminum absorption and does not bind phosphate as efficiently as calcium acetate or calcium carbonate (21631). Some clinical research also shows that taking calcium orally reduces blood pressure in patients with kidney failure (975).

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis. Oral calcium in combination with vitamin D prevents bone density loss that occurs during long-term treatment with corticosteroids. Details: Taking calcium in combination with vitamin D as adjunctive therapy seems to be effective for reducing bone mineral density loss in people using corticosteroids long-term (982,1046,1830,1831,1832,4462,4463,4464,4465,4466)(4467,12945,38493). One specific product used in clinical research is Oscal (Marion Merrel Dow Inc.), which contains elemental calcium 500 mg per tablet plus vitamin D 125 IU per tablet (982). Another product used is Oscal 250 + D (SmithKline Beecham Healthcare), which contains elemental calcium 250 mg and vitamin D 125 IU per tablet (1046).
• Hyperparathyroidism. Oral calcium reduces parathyroid hormone levels in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism due to kidney failure. Details: Taking calcium orally reduces parathyroid hormone levels in patients with kidney failure and secondary hyperparathyroidism (1827,1828,1829,39174,39425). In elderly women, the combination of calcium and vitamin D reverses secondary hyperparathyroidism and reduces hip fracture risk (8818). Also, population research suggests increased calcium intake from the diet and supplements reduces the risk of primary hyperparathyroidism in women. Supplemental intakes of at least 500 mg/day and dietary intakes of approximately 1100 mg/day are considered to be protective (91353).
• Osteoporosis. Adequate calcium intake, from the diet and/or supplements, is recommended for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Details: The Bone Health and Osteoporosis Foundation (BHOF) recommends ensuring adequate calcium intake in line with the recommended dietary allowance (RDA) by age, along with adequate vitamin D intake, for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in adults over 50 years of age. Supplementation can be used to augment dietary intake when adequate dietary intake is not feasible (109425). In the US and Canada, foods containing at least 200 mg calcium with less phosphorous content than calcium can be labelled with a health claim regarding the relationship between adequate calcium intake and a reduced risk for osteoporosis (11940,102148). However, calcium supplementation is not recommended specifically for the primary prevention of osteoporosis. The US Preventive Task Force (USPSTF) states that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of vitamin D and calcium supplementation, alone or in combination, for the primary prevention of fractures in community dwelling adults without osteoporosis (95695). Also, calcium supplements do not seem to be effective for preventing loss of bone mineral density (BMD) during lactation (988), in patients who have had bone marrow transplantation (1817), or in patients who have had renal transplantation (4823,38736,38871). Maximal bone growth occurs in the teenage years, and then BMD in females remains relatively constant until age 30-40. After age 40, bone loss typically occurs at rates of 0.5% to 1% per year. In males, this occurs several decades later. Bone loss is more pronounced if dietary calcium intake is below the RDA, which is the case for many Americans (2571,2578). One meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in healthy children 7-14 years old shows that fortifying food with calcium 250-1000 mg daily for up to 24 months modestly improves femoral neck BMD, but not hip or spine BMD. However, the included trials did not supplement vitamin D (107232). During the 5 years immediately after menopause, calcium supplementation has very little effect on bone loss (2569,2570,2575,2576). The rapid loss of estrogen causes a high bone resorption rate, which increases serum calcium levels and therefore decreases intestinal absorption of calcium (2570). After this period, the typical rate of bone loss is 2% per year (2572,2576). Taking calcium 1000-1600 mg daily as carbonate, citrate, lactate gluconate, or citrate malate salt decreases this rate by 0.25% to 1% annually (977,979,981,2569,2571,2572,2575,2576,2578,6850)(38978,38980,39064). The greatest reductions (1% or more) are seen in the first 1-2 years of supplementation when bone remodeling foci can be filled (2569,2576). After this period, the differences in rate of loss between supplemented and non-supplemented females are closer to 0.25% per year (2569,2577). A meta-analysis of clinical evidence suggests that there is no additional benefit after 4 years (38980). Small clinical studies have found that continuous calcium supplementation at an average daily dose of 1050 mg, started after menopause and continued for 1.5-4 years, may reduce fracture rates by 26% when compared with no calcium supplementation. The largest of these studies was conducted in nursing home residents who also received daily vitamin D; the benefits of calcium, specifically, are unclear (39386). Some research also suggests that calcium and vitamin D improves primary prevention of osteoporotic fractures in some older individuals with osteoporosis, particularly the elderly and those who are no longer community dwelling (12930,38875,38849,39026,109471). However, not all research is positive. One large clinical trial in elderly adults with a low-trauma fracture show that taking calcium 1000 mg daily with or without vitamin D 800 IU daily for 2-7 years does not reduce the risk of a second fracture when compared with placebo (13073). Another clinical study shows that taking calcium 1000 mg daily plus vitamin D 800 IU daily does not prevent a second fracture in elderly patients, or prevent a first fracture in elderly patients with other risk factors such as low body weight (less than 58 kg, 127.6 pounds), smoking, family history of hip fracture, or fair or poor self-reported health (12929). Also, some exploratory research suggests that supplements may need to be continued indefinitely; in adults over 68 years of age, any effects of 2 years of calcium supplements on BMD appear to be lost within 2 years after discontinuing supplements (6853). Calcium has additive effects when used with other agents such as vitamin D, estrogens, or calcitonin. Whereas calcium alone generally reduces or prevents loss of BMD, combination with other agents can produce small increases in BMD ranging from 0.3% to 3.3% depending on the combination and dosages used (978,980,1836,2570,2571,2572,2576). However, one meta-analysis in healthy adults shows that fortifying foods with calcium 250-1000 mg daily, in conjunction with vitamin D supplementation, for up to 24 months does not improve BMD when compared with control (107232). The full potential of osteoporosis treatments cannot be realized without adequate calcium intake (2569,2570,2571,2572). Advise patients taking agents such as estrogens, calcitonin, bisphosphonates, or raloxifene (Evista) to ensure that their daily calcium intake meets the RDA. Use supplements if necessary. The usefulness of calcium in preventing osteoporosis in males is not as well-studied. Some observational research has found that calcium 870 mg daily is not associated with changes in BMD and bone loss in males (97201). However, clinical evidence suggests that taking calcium 1000 mg daily for 2 years might improve trabecular or cortical bone mass by 2% to 4% (980,8827,8873). Dietary supplementation with calcium and vitamin D seems to moderately reduce bone loss measured in the femoral neck, spine, and total body, and seems to reduce the incidence of nonvertebral fractures in older patients with osteopenia or low BMD (980).
• Premenstrual syndrome (PMS). Adequate calcium intake seems to prevent symptoms of PMS. Details: There seems to be a link between low dietary calcium intake and symptoms of PMS (2004,6847,39007). Taking calcium 1000-1336 mg daily seems to significantly reduce depressed mood, water retention, and pain, especially if daily calcium intake is inadequate (1822,1823,1824,2004,95821). Calcium carbonate 1200 mg daily seems to decrease PMS symptom scores by about 18% when compared with placebo (1822). Increasing dietary calcium intake is also associated with a decreased risk of developing PMS. Consuming an average of 1283 mg of calcium per day from foods is associated with about a 30% lower risk of developing PMS compared with consuming an average of 529 mg daily (13094); however, taking calcium supplements does not appear to be associated with the risk of developing PMS.

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Colorectal cancer. Oral calcium seems to be beneficial for preventing colorectal cancer, especially in those with adequate vitamin D levels and normal body mass index (BMI). Details: Population studies have found that increased intake of dietary or supplemental calcium is associated with a reduced risk of colorectal cancer and colorectal adenomas (1047,8820,12120,38951,98898,98899). Clinical trials and meta-analyses of clinical research also show that taking calcium supplements 1.2-2 grams daily for up to 4 years can reduce the risk of colorectal adenoma recurrence by up to 29% (970,12118,12950,15267,34596,38718,39042,95817). However, not all research has been positive. Some meta-analyses of clinical research or observational studies suggest that taking calcium does not reduce the risk of familial adenomatous polyposis or colorectal cancer (34596,39042,39349). Other contradictory research suggests that postmenopausal females who take calcium 1000 mg daily plus vitamin D 400 IU daily do not have a reduced risk of developing colorectal cancer (14290); however, this finding may not be reliable due to the high baseline intake of calcium in study participants. The reason for these conflicting findings is not entirely clear. Vitamin D might be an important factor. People with lower than average vitamin D levels do not seem to get any benefit from calcium supplements (12118). Also, one meta-analysis of previous trials suggests that taking calcium 1200 mg daily reduces the risk of colorectal adenomas in people with a normal BMI, but not in those who are overweight or obese (99715). Despite this conflicting evidence, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim in 2005 stating that calcium supplements may reduce the risk of colorectal cancer and colorectal adenomas. However, the FDA has determined that there is little scientific evidence to support this claim (102366).
• Fetal bone mineralization. If calcium intakes are low during pregnancy, oral calcium seems to be beneficial for increasing fetal bone density. Details: With low dietary calcium intake (less than 562 mg elemental calcium daily) during pregnancy, calcium supplementation increases fetal bone mineralization and density. However, calcium supplementation does not offer any additional benefit if calcium intakes are adequate (3263,3264).
• Hypertension. Oral calcium seems to reduce blood pressure by a small amount. However, it is unclear if this reduction is clinically significant. Details: Many clinical trials and observational studies show that intake of calcium supplements or dietary calcium modestly reduces blood pressure in patients with or without hypertension, usually around 1-2 mmHg. Calcium seems to be more effective for certain subpopulations of patients, such as salt-sensitive people and patients with low baseline dietary calcium intake (945,972,974,976,984,1818,1819,1820,1821,6852)(13138,14406,38803,39063,39094,39221). Also, a meta-analysis of clinical research shows that calcium intake during pregnancy reduces systolic blood pressure in offspring by 1-2 mmHg (38852). However, a large-scale clinical trial in postmenopausal females shows that taking vitamin D (cholecalciferol) 400 IU daily in combination with elemental calcium 1000 mg daily does not lower blood pressure or reduce the risk of developing hypertension (16714). Additionally, a meta-analysis of 8 clinical trials shows that taking calcium in combination with vitamin D for up to 7 years has no effect on blood pressure (98861). The validity of this finding is limited by the poor methodological quality of the included studies. Some observational research suggests that calcium can reduce the risk for hypertension. Population research in females aged 45 years and older suggests that higher intake of calcium from both diet and supplement sources is linked to a lower risk of developing hypertension when compared to lower calcium intake (14265). In 2005, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim stating that calcium supplements may reduce the risk of hypertension. However, the FDA has concluded that this claim is based on supporting, rather than conclusive, evidence (102367).
• Osteomalacia. Oral calcium seems to reverse osteomalacia caused by very low calcium intakes. Details: Osteomalacia is commonly caused by vitamin D deficiency; however, very low calcium intake can also lead to osteomalacia in children and adults. Calcium supplementation can reverse osteomalacia caused by calcium deficiency. Along with appropriate vitamin D supplementation, individuals at risk of osteomalacia need sufficient calcium intake (94819).
• Pre-eclampsia. Oral calcium seems to reduce the risk of pre-eclampsia in high risk pregnancies, especially if calcium intakes are low. Details: Although there is some conflicting evidence (971,38756), most clinical research shows that taking calcium orally 1-2 grams daily reduces pregnancy-related hypertension and pre-eclampsia (973,1833,8828,39043,39319,39426,96480). Calcium appears to reduce the risk of pre-eclampsia by about 50% when compared with placebo. One meta-analysis of 19 controlled trials involving over 29,000 pregnancies found that for every 19 females treated with calcium, one episode of pre-eclampsia would be avoided (96480). Calcium appears to have the greatest effect in individuals at high-risk of pre-eclampsia or with low calcium levels, and when taken at greater than or equal to 20 weeks of gestation (15029,38497,96480,99714). In 2005, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim regarding the use of calcium supplements to reduce the risk of pregnancy-induced hypertension and pre-eclampsia. However, due to the limited and conflicting research available at that time, the FDA stated that this outcome was highly unlikely. Since then, large, high-quality clinical research has supported this finding. In fact, in 2016 the World Health Organization (WHO) released a recommendation to prescribe oral calcium supplementation 1.5-2 grams daily during pregnancies at high risk of pre-eclampsia if dietary calcium intakes are low, in order to prevent pre-eclampsia (97347).
• Rickets. Oral calcium seems to reverse rickets caused by very low calcium intakes. Details: Rickets is commonly caused be vitamin D deficiency; however, very low calcium intake can also lead to rickets. Calcium supplementation can reverse rickets caused by calcium deficiency (94819). A small clinical study in children with nutritional rickets shows that taking calcium 500-2000 mg daily for 24 weeks improves radiographically measured rickets caused by calcium deficiency. Rickets seems to improve more rapidly with calcium 1000 mg compared to calcium 500 mg. However, increasing the calcium dose to 2000 mg daily is not more beneficial than calcium 1000 mg daily (98904).
• Tooth retention. Oral calcium with vitamin D seems to help with tooth retention in the elderly population. Details: A clinical trial in the elderly population shows that taking calcium citrate malate 500 mg daily along with vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 700 IU daily orally for 3 years reduces the risk of tooth loss by about 52% when compared with placebo (8816).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Breast cancer. Oral calcium does not seem to be beneficial for breast cancer prevention. Details: Although some population research disagrees (15631,39041,95811,107237), most research shows that increased calcium intake is not associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer (15631,16715,98895,107236,107237). Subgroup analyses of population research suggest that calcium intake may reduce the risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal, but not pre-menopausal, adults (15631,107237). Another subgroup analysis in a large meta-analysis of population research also suggests that dietary intake may reduce estrogen receptor(ER)-negative breast cancer, but not ER-positive breast cancer (107236). However, most other research has not evaluated the effects of calcium supplementation or intake on breast cancer subtypes. The best evidence to date, from a large scale clinical trial (Women's Health Initiative), shows that taking vitamin D (cholecalciferol) 400 IU daily plus calcium 1000 mg daily for 7 years after menopause does not reduce the risk of developing invasive breast cancer at the end of the study and 5 years after the end of the intervention (16715,98895).
• Fractures. Although oral calcium prevents fractures in osteoporosis, most evidence shows that calcium does NOT prevent factures in people who do not have osteoporosis. See Osteoporosis discussion for more information on the use of calcium for this purpose. Details: The most recent and robust meta-analysis of clinical research shows that calcium supplementation with or without vitamin D is NOT associated with reduced fractures in older adults without osteoporosis (95822). A large-scale study in postmenopausal females aged 50-79 years suggests calcium 1000 mg plus vitamin D 400 IU daily for 7 years only modestly improves bone mineral density (BMD) and does not significantly reduce fracture risk. This lack of effect may have been due to low adherence to the treatment regimen. In those who were 80% adherent, the combination of calcium plus vitamin D reduced the risk of hip fracture by about 29% (14282). Also, some clinical research shows that taking calcium carbonate 1000 mg and vitamin D 400 IU for 5 years does not attenuate loss of height after menopause when compared with placebo (95810). Additional meta-analyses of clinical and observational evidence suggest that calcium supplementation is not associated with a reduced risk of vertebral or nonvertebral fractures, such as hip fractures (38589,38888,98895). Some other research has suggested that calcium in combination with vitamin D reduces fracture risk in older patients without osteoporosis (980,1836,8818,12930,12933,12952,38849,102145,107235); however, this research is confounded by a number of variables, including the presence of hormonal therapy and differing levels of fracture risk at baseline (1836,8818,95822). Conflicting findings on this topic might also be due to genetic differences in patient populations. A population analysis of the Women's Health Initiative study found that, in older females with the lowest genetic susceptibility to low bone mineral density (BMD), taking calcium with vitamin D is associated with a reduction in fracture risk. However, in females with a higher genetic susceptibility to low BMD, there is no association between supplementation and fracture risk. This might be because individuals with a lower susceptibility to low BMD are also more responsive to calcium and vitamin D supplementation (97357). As of April 2018, the U.S. Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) concludes that there is insufficient evidence to determine whether supplementing with vitamin D >400 IU daily along with calcium >1000 mg daily is safe and effective for preventing fractures in community dwelling adults without vitamin D deficiency, osteoporosis, or a history of fracture. USPSTF recommends against supplementing with calcium 1000 mg daily or less along with vitamin D 400 IU daily or less for preventing primary fractures in community-dwelling postmenopausal females (95695).
• Obesity. Oral calcium does not seem to improve weight loss. Details: Observational research has found that adults and children with low calcium intake are more likely to gain weight, have a higher body mass index (BMI), and be overweight or obese when compared to people with high calcium intake (12124,12125,12126,12127,14265). Additional observational research has found that increasing calcium intake is associated with weight loss in females; the results in males have been conflicting (12127,15602,15603). Despite these findings from observational research and a few small clinical studies (12128,15397,14438,98905), most clinical research has found that increased calcium intake does not increase weight loss (12052,13138,15396,15399,38985,39004,97356). The most recent meta-analysis of 20 clinical studies shows that daily dietary and supplemental calcium intake that meets the dietary reference intake (DRI) of 1000 mg or more daily does not increase weight loss in overweight individuals or patients with obesity when compared with intake below the DRI (95813). An older meta-analysis of 13 clinical trials also shows that increased dietary and supplemental calcium intake does not increase weight loss (15605).
• Overall mortality. Oral calcium does not seem to reduce overall mortality. Details: While some population research has found that calcium taken in combination with vitamin D in older females is associated with a lower risk of death (97353), most evidence shows that calcium, with or without vitamin D, has no effect on all-cause mortality (93533,97308).

INEFFECTIVE

• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Oral calcium does not reduce the risk of developing CVD and may actually increase risk in some patients. Details: Clinical research shows that calcium does not decrease CVD risk. Several separate meta-analyses of clinical and population research involving over 50,000 patients show that taking calcium 600-1200 mg daily for up to 7 years does not reduce the risk of CVD-related outcomes, including stroke and myocardial infarction, cardiovascular death, or overall mortality (39018,91350,92994,93533,97308,98902,107231,107233). No association was found between total dietary or supplemental calcium intake with or without vitamin D and the risk of CVD or mortality (91350,93533,97308). In fact, some population and clinical research has found that when calcium is used alone or with vitamin D, there is an INCREASED risk of CVD and coronary heart disease (38077,107233). However, other clinical research disagrees (93533). One meta-analysis of high-quality randomized controlled trials shows that taking calcium for 2-7 years increases the risk of CVD and coronary heart disease by 1.1-1.2 times when compared with control. However, the majority of the included research evaluated postmenopausal females and it is unclear if this finding is applicable to other populations (107233).
• Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Intravenous calcium does not prevent nerve pain in patients given oxaliplatin. Oral calcium has not been evaluated for this purpose. Details: While pooled analyses of cohort studies and randomized controlled trials suggest that calcium and magnesium infusion decreases the incidence of oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity, a meta-analysis of only randomized controlled trials shows that the infusion has no effect in preventing neurotoxicity (90028,90029,90031). Additionally, clinical trials show that administering calcium gluconate 1 gram with magnesium sulfate 1 gram intravenously immediately before, or before and after, the administration of a single oxaliplatin cycle (90005), or over the entire 6-cycle course of oxaliplatin, does not improve symptoms of neurotoxicity when compared with placebo (96474).
• Myocardial infarction (MI). Oral calcium does not prevent MI. When taken in the absence of vitamin D, oral calcium may increase the risk of MI. Details: Population research has found that increased dietary intake of calcium is associated with a decreased risk of MI (91350). However, a 2010 meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking calcium at a dose of at least 500 mg daily is associated with an approximate 30% INCREASE in the risk of MI in patients over the age of 40. According to this analysis, one additional case of MI will occur for every 69 patients that take calcium for 5 years (17482). A more recent meta-analysis of high-quality randomized controlled trials shows that taking calcium for 2-7 years increases the risk of MI by 1.2 times when compared with control. However, the majority of the included research studied postmenopausal females and it is unclear if this finding is applicable to other populations (107233) In contrast, other meta-analyses of clinical research have shown that taking calcium for up to 7 years is NOT associated with an increased risk of MI, including a meta-analysis that only included postmenopausal females (93533,107231). Reasons for these discrepancies are not entirely clear. It may relate to whether calcium is taken as monotherapy or in combination with vitamin D. When taken with vitamin D, which is commonly recommended, calcium supplementation does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of MI in postmenopausal females (93533). Also, the association between calcium supplementation and MI risk may be influenced by the amount of calcium consumed as part of the diet. Supplementation with calcium may be associated with an increased risk of MI in people with dietary calcium intake above 805 mg daily, but not in those with dietary calcium intake below 805 mg daily (17482)

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Alcohol use disorder. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for alcohol use disorder. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking calcium carbonate 800 mg and vitamin D 200 IU orally daily for 14 days modestly reduces alcohol craving scores and withdrawal scores when compared with placebo in adults with alcohol dependence that are undergoing withdrawal. Taking calcium carbonate did not reduce the need for diazepam; however, the study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups (107234).
• Atherosclerosis. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for atherosclerosis. Details: A population study has found that taking calcium 1.2 grams daily for 3 years has no effect on carotid intima thickness or carotid atherosclerosis incidence. A total calcium intake (dietary and supplemental) of at least 1794 mg daily in older females may be associated with a decreased risk of carotid atherosclerosis when compared with a total calcium intake below 1010 mg daily (97351).
• Autism spectrum disorder. It is unclear if oral calcium during pregnancy is beneficial for reducing the odds of autism spectrum disorder in the offspring. Details: A small observational study found that calcium supplementation during pregnancy is associated with a 52% reduced odds of an autism spectrum disorder in the offspring (98900).
• Cancer. Oral calcium alone does not seem to prevent cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium with vitamin D is beneficial for preventing cancer. Details: Taking calcium alone does not seem to significantly reduce the risk of cancer (12118,15629). The role of calcium in cancer prevention when taken along with vitamin D is controversial, as conflicting results exist. One clinical trial shows that healthy postmenopausal females who take supplemental calcium 1400-1500 mg daily plus vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 1100 IU daily have a 60% lower relative risk for developing cancer of any type. Approximately 25 postmenopausal females would need to take this combination for 4 years to prevent one occurrence of cancer (15629). However, a more recent clinical study shows that healthy postmenopausal females who take supplemental calcium 1500 mg daily plus vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 2000 IU daily do not have a reduced risk of cancer at 4 years (93943). Reasons for the disparate results are not entirely clear. The discrepancies do not appear to be related to baseline vitamin D levels or different study populations. It is possible that, given the 10-year time lapse between the two publications, the discrepancies result from differences in cancer detection capability. Also, since cancer risk was a secondary outcome measure in the earlier study and a primary outcome measure in the more recent study, it is possible that the discrepancies result from differences in statistical methodologies. The effect of vitamin D and calcium on cancer risk in males and younger patients is not known. There is also interest in using calcium for reducing the risk of hematological malignancies. An analysis of the Women's Health Initiative study shows that taking calcium 1000 mg daily in combination with vitamin D3 400 IU for up to 10 years is associated with a 20% reduction in the risk of hematologic malignancies when compared with placebo. However, no effect on hematologic malignancy related mortality was seen (97354).
• Depression. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for depression prevention. Details: Population research has found no association between a higher dietary intake of calcium and the risk of depression when compared with a lower dietary intake of calcium (96480).
• Diabetes. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for type 2 diabetes prevention. Details: Some population research has found that a higher intake of calcium from diet or supplements, alone or in combination with vitamin D, is associated with a lower risk of developing type 2 diabetes when compared with lower calcium intake (14265,16713,96473). However, population research is often limited by confounding variables. For example, one analysis found that any beneficial effect might be influenced by concomitant magnesium intake (96473). Furthermore, other population research has found that serum calcium levels higher than 9.6 mg/dL are associated with greater risk of developing diabetes in Chinese adults with osteoporosis. This study is limited because it was not determined whether increased serum calcium was due to increased calcium intake or another factor such as parathyroid function (95815).
• Dysmenorrhea. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for reducing pain associated with dysmenorrhea. Details: Clinical research shows that taking calcium carbonate 1000 mg with vitamin D 5000 IU daily for three menstrual cycles does not reduce pain when compared with placebo in patients with primary dysmenorrhea (95821). However, calcium carbonate 1000 mg taken alone seems to reduce pain when compared with placebo.
• Endometrial cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for endometrial cancer prevention. Details: A meta-analysis of population research suggests that calcium supplements may reduce the risk of endometrial cancer, but dietary calcium does not seem to have any effect (38893).
• Fall prevention. It is unclear if oral calcium with vitamin D is beneficial for preventing falls. Details: Research suggests that calcium in combination with vitamin D, but not calcium alone, might prevent falls by decreasing body sway and normalizing systolic blood pressure (6362,11939,39038). Some experts think the combination of calcium and vitamin D may be important (11916). Preliminary clinical research in adults residing in a health care facility shows that taking vitamin D supplements while increasing dietary calcium and protein for 2 years reduces falls by 11% when compared with standard diets. Intervention diets were supplemented with milk, yogurt, and cheese to provide calcium 1142 mg and protein 69 grams daily (107235). There might also be different effects in females compared to males. In one study, females aged 65 years or older who took vitamin D 700 IU plus calcium citrate 500 mg daily over a 3-year period had a 46% lower risk of falling. However, this combination did not decrease falls in males (14291).
• Fluorosis. Oral calcium has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Taking calcium orally, in combination with ascorbic acid (vitamin C) and vitamin D, seems to be effective for reducing excessive fluoride levels in children and improving symptoms of fluorosis in children aged 6-12 years (990).
• Heart failure. It is unclear if oral calcium in combination with vitamin D is beneficial for preventing heart failure. Details: Based on a secondary analysis of a large-scale clinical trial (Women's Health Initiative), taking calcium 1000 mg with vitamin D 400 IU daily does not reduce the risk of heart failure in the overall population or in individuals at high risk. However, in a subgroup of postmenopausal females without risk factors for heart failure, calcium and vitamin D supplementation might reduce the risk of developing heart failure by about 37% (97307).
• Hypercholesterolemia. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for hypercholesterolemia. Details: Some evidence shows that taking calcium carbonate 400 mg three times daily reduces low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels by 4% and increases high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels by 4% after 6 weeks of treatment when used in combination with a low-fat diet (American Heart Association Step 1) (2557). In contrast, a study in females with dyslipidemia shows that taking calcium 800 mg daily for 2 years might INCREASE total cholesterol levels by about 12 mg/dL when compared with placebo. This same study showed an association between calcium supplementation and an increase in total cholesterol levels and carotid intimal thickness in postmenopausal females, but not premenopausal females (97350). A recent meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials which included both healthy patients and patients with dyslipidemia shows that taking calcium 500-2000 mg daily and vitamin D 200-7142 IU daily modestly improves HDL cholesterol and triglyceride levels, but not LDL cholesterol levels, when compared with placebo. Subgroup analyses suggest that calcium and vitamin D supplementation is more effective in patients with dyslipidemia at baseline. It is unclear if this effect is due to calcium, vitamin D, or the combination (107227). However, other research shows that taking a specific supplement containing calcium 600 mg plus vitamin D 200 IU (Caltrate 600 D, Wyeth Consumer Healthcare Inc.) twice daily in combination with calorie restriction does not reduce total or LDL cholesterol levels when compared with placebo (15601).
• Lead toxicity. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for reducing blood levels of lead. Details: Lead is mobilized along with calcium from bone during pregnancy and lactation, resulting in increased serum concentrations of lead. One clinical study suggests that calcium supplementation does not significantly decrease these elevated lead concentrations (1586). However, another clinical study suggests that taking calcium reduces blood lead levels by 11% when compared with placebo, with greatest effects observed in those with high baseline levels of lead (38957).
• Lyme disease. Although there is interest in using oral calcium for Lyme disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of calcium for this condition.
• Metabolic syndrome. It is unclear if oral calcium alone or with vitamin D is beneficial for metabolic syndrome prevention. Details: Population research has found that a higher intake of calcium from diet and supplements alone, or in combination with vitamin D, is associated with a lower risk of developing metabolic syndrome when compared with lower calcium intake (14265,16713).
• Nephrotic syndrome. It is unclear if oral calcium with vitamin D is beneficial for preventing nephrotic syndrome. Details: Clinical research shows that taking calcium 500-1000 mg daily for 3 months in combination with vitamin D3 60,000 IU daily or weekly for 4 weeks has no effect on bone mineral density or the risk of relapse in children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (97355).
• Nonmelanoma skin cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for preventing keratinocyte carcinomas. Details: In middle aged and older adults recently diagnosed with a colorectal adenoma, clinical research shows that taking calcium 1200 mg daily as calcium carbonate for 3-5 years does not reduce the incidence of keratinocyte cancer when compared with placebo over a median of 8 years. A sub-group analysis shows that taking calcium alone or with vitamin D3 1000 IU daily reduced the risk of invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma by a moderate amount, but had no effect on the risk of basal cell carcinoma (104622).
• Oral mucositis. When used in combination with fluoride treatments, a calcium phosphate mouth rinse seems to prevent and reduce mucositis-related pain in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Details: A small clinical study in patients undergoing HSCT shows that using a particular mouth rinse (Caphosol, EUSA Pharma) containing calcium phosphate, in combination with fluoride treatments, reduces days of mucositis, the duration of pain, and the dose and days of morphine used when compared with placebo and fluoride treatment (38611).
• Ovarian cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for ovarian cancer prevention. Details: An older meta-analysis of 12 cohort studies found that dietary calcium intake is not associated with a reduced risk of ovarian cancer (38792). However, a more recent pooled analysis of 15 cohort and case-control studies has found that the highest intake of dietary or dairy calcium is associated with a 20% lower risk of ovarian cancer when compared to the lowest intake (97349).
• Postpartum depression. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for reducing postpartum depression risk. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking calcium 2 grams daily beginning at 11-21 weeks gestation reduces depression at 12 weeks postpartum when compared with placebo. However, no benefit is seen at 6 weeks postpartum (39447).
• Pregnancy-related leg cramps. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for preventing leg cramps during pregnancy. Details: A small clinical study shows that taking calcium 1 gram twice daily (as a mixture of salts) for 2 weeks can reduce pregnancy-related leg cramps during the second half of pregnancy when compared with no treatment (2567).
• Prostate cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for prostate cancer prevention. Details: Some clinical research shows that taking calcium 1200 mg daily might decrease the risk of developing prostate cancer (14133). However, some epidemiological research suggests that consuming very high doses of calcium, over 2000 mg daily, might actually increase the risk of developing prostate cancer (14134). Some epidemiological research also suggests that doses greater than 1500 mg daily increase the risk of poorly differentiated, clinically advanced, and fatal prostate cancer (14132). Consumption of dairy products has also been weakly linked to a modest increase in risk of prostate cancer (98894). However, contradictory research suggests that there is no association between dietary intake of calcium and overall risk of prostate cancer (14131,14132,104630).
• Stroke. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for stroke prevention. Details: Some population research has found that increasing dietary calcium intake is associated with a decreased risk of ischemic stroke (4822,38678). However, other population research has found that increasing dietary calcium intake is not associated with a decreased risk of stroke (91350). One meta-analysis of high-quality randomized controlled trials shows that taking calcium for 2-7 years does not affect the risk of stroke when compared with control. However, the majority of the included research evaluated postmenopausal females, and it is unclear if this finding is applicable to other populations (107233).
• Vertigo. Oral calcium with vitamin D might reduce positional vertigo; the effect of calcium when used alone is unclear. Details: A large clinical study in adults with recurrent benign paroxysmal positional vertigo shows that taking calcium 500 mg and vitamin D 400 IU twice daily for one year reduces annual recurrence of vertigo by 27% when compared with no treatment. The number needed to treat to prevent vertigo was 3.7 (103681). It is unclear if this benefit is due to vitamin D, calcium, or the combination. More evidence is needed to rate calcium for these uses.

(Read more about CALCIUM)

EFFECTIVE

• Folate deficiency. Oral or intravenous folic acid is effective for the prevention or treatment of folate deficiency. Details: Administering folic acid orally or parenterally improves and prevents folate deficiency (505,8739). Clinical research shows that supplementation with folic acid 100 mcg to 5 mg daily during pregnancy decreases the risk of developing megaloblastic anemia by up to 79% (91307).

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Kidney failure. Taking folic acid orally reduces homocysteine levels in people with kidney failure who are on hemodialysis. Details: Over 85% of people with kidney failure have hyperhomocysteinemia. Treatment of hyperhomocysteinemia in kidney failure is often more difficult than with normal kidney function (1489,3324,7289,9413,9414,9416). The reasons for this are not fully understood; renal uptake and metabolism of homocysteine may be reduced in severe kidney failure, and hemodialysis may contribute to vitamin deficiencies (6884,9414,9417). Folic acid 0.8-15 mg daily or 3 times weekly is generally used, but the degree of homocysteine reduction varies between 12% to 50%, and normal homocysteine levels (less than 12 µmol/L) cannot always be achieved. Adding vitamin B12 400-1000 mcg daily and vitamin B6 20-50 mg daily produces an additional reduction in homocysteine (1489,6884,7289,7881,9322,9413,9414,9415,9416,9417). Folic acid doses greater than 15 mg daily do not seem to provide additional benefit. Also, doses of 30-60 mg might cause a rebound in homocysteine levels when treatment is stopped (9219). Despite the homocysteine-lowering effect of folic acid in kidney failure, the most robust meta-analysis of 11 clinical trials suggests that folic acid supplementation does not seem to reduce the risk of cardiovascular events (50527). A smaller meta-analysis of 7 clinical trials that used a different primary composite outcome suggests that folic acid might reduce the risk of cardiovascular events by 15% when compared with control (91311). There has also been interest in using a reduced form of folic acid, L-5-methyltetrahydrofolate (L-5-MTHF). One study in patients on hemodialysis suggests that taking L-5-MTHF 17 mg daily for 12 weeks might lower homocysteine levels to a greater extent than an equimolar 15 mg of folic acid (104908). Another clinical trial in patients on hemodialysis suggests that giving intravenous L-5-MTHF 50 mg three times weekly is associated with an increased survival of about 36 months, compared with about 26 months with folic acid 5 mg daily. There was no difference in homocysteine reduction between groups (104909). These results should be interpreted with caution because they have not been replicated, and there was no placebo control. Furthermore, survival may have been affected by the availability of kidney transplants.
• Hyperhomocysteinemia. Oral folic acid, taken alone or in combination with other B vitamins, lowers homocysteine levels in most patients. However, it is unclear if this has cardiovascular benefits. Details: Taking folic acid orally 0.4-5 mg daily lowers fasting homocysteine levels by 20% to 30% in people with normal to moderately elevated homocysteine levels at baseline. Folic acid 0.8-1 mg daily seems to provide maximal reduction (9307,9400,9401,9405,9408,11337,11338,50145). Doses above 1 mg daily do not seem to add benefit (9307), except in some people with certain gene mutations that cause homocysteine levels of 20 µmol/L or higher (9408). The higher the initial homocysteine levels, the lower the folic acid dose needed to attain maximum homocysteine reduction (9307). The effects of folic acid supplementation on homocysteine concentrations appear to be greater in females than males (50145). Adding vitamin B6 25-250 mg or vitamin B12 500 mcg seems to further reduce homocysteine levels (1489,9400,9405,9406,9408,107136). Some experts recommend routine use of vitamin B12 in homocysteine-lowering regimens to avoid the risk of neuropathy in people with undetected vitamin B12 deficiency (9405). Increasing folic acid intake with supplements or folate-fortified cereal products is more effective for reducing homocysteine levels than increasing intake of folate-rich foods (6367). Fortification of cereals and flour with 140 mcg folic acid per 100 grams reduces the mean homocysteine level in the general population by about 7% (7881,9404,9407). Elevated homocysteine levels are considered by some to be an independent risk factor for atherosclerosis progression, recurrent thromboembolism, deep vein thrombosis, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and other vascular complications (3886,3887,6236,7725,9314,9318,50509). However, elevated homocysteine levels may be a marker, as opposed to a cause, of vascular disease (11387,11388). Although folic acid lowers homocysteine levels, it is not yet known whether this reduces the risk of vascular disease. One meta-analysis shows that taking folic acid can reduce the risk of stroke by about 10% in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD); the reduction is greatest in patients for whom homocysteine levels are lowered by at least 25% (96157). A meta-analysis of 10 clinical trials, including over 44,000 patients at risk for or with a history of CVD, shows that B vitamin supplementation reduces the relative risk of stroke by 10% when compared with placebo (97619). Also, a meta-analysis in patients with a history of stroke shows that B vitamin supplementation, including folic acid, reduces the relative risk of stroke recurrence by 13% and the risk of vascular death by 11% when compared with placebo (107136). However other research does not agree. Meta-analyses of clinical research show that folic acid does not prevent CVD or coronary heart disease, in spite of lowering homocysteine by up to 55%, when individuals with normal or high levels of homocysteine are considered (50539,96147,97619). Furthermore, most research shows that folic acid supplementation, alone or in combination with vitamin B6 and vitamin B12, does not improve endothelial function or improve secondary prevention of cardiovascular events such as myocardial infarction in people with existing CVD despite a homocysteine-lowering effect (9313,11337,11387,13482,50437,97619). Some research even suggests an increase in CVD risk concurrent with homocysteine lowering (13482). Large randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm or refute these findings. Some researchers hypothesize that different genetic profiles might explain some of these conflicting results. For instance, individuals with a homozygous 677TT MTHFR genotype typically have increased homocysteine levels. However, a meta-analysis suggests that treatment with folic acid does not reduce the risk of ischemic heart disease despite reducing homocysteine levels in individuals with 677TT MTHFR (50456). It has also been theorized that a reduced form of folic acid, 5-methyltetrahydrofolate (5-MTHF) might work better in these individuals. Although [6RS]-5-MTHF has been shown to lower homocysteine levels (104915), studies assessing its cardiovascular benefits are lacking.
• Methotrexate toxicity. Oral folic acid reduces the severity of methotrexate toxicity. Details: Oral folic acid reduces methotrexate toxicity symptoms, such as nausea and vomiting, in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriasis (768,2162,2163,2164,4492,4493,4494,9369,9419). Folic acid also seems to reduce methotrexate-induced hepatic side effects by approximately 36% (50320). Some research shows that a low, 0.8 mg weekly dose of folic acid is equally effective to a higher dose of 5 mg weekly for the prevention of methotrexate toxicity (102388).
• Neural tube birth defects. Oral folic acid helps to prevent neural tube birth defects in newborns. Details: Clinical practice guidelines recommend that anyone capable of becoming pregnant take folic acid 400 mcg daily from fortified foods or supplements to prevent neural tube birth defects in infants. Folic acid 600 mcg daily is advised during pregnancy (94811,96146). This recommendation is based on research showing that a higher intake of folic acid from food and supplements during pregnancy reduces the primary incidence of neural tube birth defects by 41% to 69% (3325,9309,50344,50403,50468,95156). Individuals with a history of children with neural tube birth defects usually take a higher dose of folic acid 4000 mcg daily starting one month before and continuing for up to 3 months after conception (96146). Evidence shows that, when used for secondary prevention, folic acid supplementation reduces the incidence of neural tube defects by 66% to 87% (21235,50263,50344,50403,95156). In the US, foods containing at least 60 mcg of folic acid can be labeled with a health claim stating that healthful diets with adequate folic acid intake may reduce the risk of having a child with a brain or spinal cord defect (102369).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Cognitive impairment. Taking folic acid alone, with other B vitamins or with docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), might improve thinking and memory skills in older patients with cognitive impairment. Details: One clinical trial in patients aged 65 years and older with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) shows that taking folic acid 400 mcg daily for 2 years increases IQ scores when compared with placebo (100952). Two small, low-quality clinical studies in patients aged 70-90 years with cognitive impairment and low folate levels or folate deficiency shows that taking folic acid 5 or 15 mg daily for up to 63 days improves cognitive function, including measures such as memory and attention, when compared with placebo or baseline (50301,104911). Folic acid also appears to be beneficial when used in combination with other B vitamins or with DHA. A clinical trial in patients aged 70 years and older with MCI shows that taking folic acid 800 mcg, vitamin B6 20 mg, and vitamin B12 500 mcg daily for 2 years mitigates decline in executive function and, in patients with high baseline homocysteine levels, improves cognition and memory when compared with placebo (50480). Taking folic acid 800 mcg with or without DHA 800 mg daily for 6 months modestly improves cognition, as measured on the full-scale intelligence quotient, when compared with placebo (103978,109196). However, this benefit is no longer present at 6 months after treatment discontinuation (109196).
• Depression. Oral folic acid seems to modestly reduce depression severity when added to conventional antidepressant therapy. It is unclear if folic acid can reduce the prevalence of depression or the risk for suicide. Details: Observational studies suggest that depression is correlated with low folate status, particularly in females (50105,50127,50243). Taking folic acid 0.2-15 mg daily for up to 6 months with conventional antidepressants seems to improve treatment response in patients with major depressive disorder (3657,10884,10887,50566,109190). One meta-analysis shows that taking L-methylfolate or folic acid as an adjunct to treatment with conventional antidepressants modestly reduces depression severity when compared with placebo and conventional antidepressants. The response and remission rates were improved by 36% and 39%, respectively (109190). However, limited clinical research suggests that folic acid is not effective as a replacement for conventional antidepressant therapy (10886). Also, a small clinical study in adolescents at high familial risk for mood disorders suggests that taking folic acid 2.5 mg daily for up to 36 months does not prevent mood disorders when compared with placebo. However, in the patients that were eventually diagnosed with depression, the time of onset was delayed from 5 months to 15.5 months in the group using folic acid when compared with placebo (91313). Guidelines from The World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) and Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) Taskforce state that folic acid is not currently recommended as monotherapy treatment for unipolar depression (110318). Observational research has also evaluated the association between folic acid supplementation and suicidal events in patients with or without depression. One within-person cohort study, in which only 12% of patients were diagnosed with depression, has found that filling a folic acid prescription of 0.4-5 mg daily, either alone or as part of a multivitamin, is associated with a reduced risk for suicidal events during the following months when compared with months without a prescription (109201). It is unclear what percentage of these patients, if any, had folate deficiency at baseline.
• Hypertension. Oral folic acid seems to modestly reduce hypertension. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking folic acid 5-10 mg daily for at least 6 weeks reduces systolic blood pressure by 2mmHg and improves flow-mediated dilation by 1.6% in hypertensive individuals (50364). Some research has evaluated folic acid in hypertensive patients when used with antihypertensive drugs. Results show that taking folic acid 400-800 mcg in combination with enalapril 10 mg daily for about 4.5 years does not improve blood pressure when compared with enalapril alone (50302,96158). However, in hypertensive patients with heavy proteinuria, this combination seems to reduce the risk of all-cause mortality by about 41% when compared with enalapril alone (96158).
• Phenytoin-induced gingival hyperplasia. Topical folic acid seems to reduce gingival hyperplasia due to phenytoin. The effect of oral folic acid is unclear. Details: Applying folic acid topically seems to inhibit gingival hyperplasia secondary to phenytoin therapy (2151). However, taking folic acid orally does not seem to improve gingival hyperplasia secondary to phenytoin therapy in adults (2150,2151,2152), although some evidence suggests that taking folic acid 500 mcg daily reduces the risk of phenytoin-induced gingival hyperplasia by 33% in children when compared with placebo (50463).
• Stroke. Although some clinical research has shown that oral folate reduces stroke risk by a small amount, more research is needed to determine who is most likely to benefit. Most individual clinical trials show that folic acid seems to reduce stroke risk only in regions without food-fortification policies. Details: Multiple clinical studies have shown that folic acid supplementation reduces the risk of stroke by 10% to 25% in regions WITHOUT established policies mandating folic acid fortification of grain products (50240,50485,50525,50539,91325,96154,96157,96159,97308). The effect appears to be greatest when folic acid is taken in low doses (usually 0.8 mg daily or lower) (50525,96157,96159), in regions with a low prevalence of statin use (50525,96159), in patients with high cholesterol levels at baseline (96152), in patients who achieve homocysteine reduction of at least 20% (50407,96157), and in patients with the lowest folate levels at baseline (96154,96157). There is also some evidence that the effect of folic acid on stroke risk is greatest in patients with low baseline levels of vitamin B12 (96159). In 2001, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) allowed a qualified health claim stating that, as part of a well-balanced diet that is low in saturated fat and cholesterol, folic acid, vitamin B6, and vitamin B12 may reduce the risk of vascular disease (102368). Most research shows that folic acid supplementation does not reduce the risk of stroke in regions WITH established policies mandating folic acid fortification (50240,50485,50525,50539,96157,96159,97308). However, there is some evidence that folic acid may reduce the risk of stroke in patients from regions with folic acid fortification who have recently had a stroke or transient ischemic attack and are not using antiplatelet drugs (90379). Meta-analyses of clinical research have been conducted. However, possible confounding due to the presence or absence of folic acid fortification is unclear. A meta-analysis of the available research in adults with existing CVD shows that folic acid supplementation at a daily dose of less than 2 mg reduces the risk for stroke by about 10% (102386). Also, a meta-analysis of 10 clinical trials, including over 44,000 patients at risk for or with a history of CVD, shows that B vitamin supplementation, including folic acid, reduces the relative risk of stroke by 10% when compared with placebo (97619). In patients with a history of stroke, a meta-analysis shows that B vitamin supplementation reduces the relative risk of stroke recurrence by 13% and the risk of vascular death by 11% when compared with placebo (107136). It is unclear if folic acid reduces the stroke risk in patients with impaired kidney function. Some research shows that taking folic acid in combination with high doses of vitamin B12 (cyanocobalamin) does not reduce the risk of stroke in these patients (11387,96150). However, there is concern that the lack of benefit may have been due to the decline in kidney function from high doses of cyanocobalamin (96150). Additional research is needed to determine if folic acid supplementation is beneficial in patients with impaired kidney function when used with other forms of vitamin B12 such as methylcobalamin or hydroxycobalamin.
• Vitiligo. Oral folic acid seems to improve vitiligo symptoms. Details: Taking folic acid orally seems to improve symptoms of vitiligo (2153,2154). This finding is supported by a meta-analysis of observational research which shows that patients with vitiligo have higher serum homocysteine levels when compared with patients without vitiligo (100951).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Anemia. Adding oral folic acid to oral iron therapy does not seem to improve hematologic parameters in patients with anemia. Details: In postpartum patients with anemia, clinical research shows that taking iron as ferrous fumarate 600 mg and folic acid 1 mg daily is no more effective than iron alone for improving hemoglobin status (91319). Also, clinical research in non-pregnant menstruating females shows that taking folic acid 0.4 mg daily or 2.8 mg once weekly for 16 weeks with iron 60 mg daily does not reduce anemia or improve iron status when compared with iron alone (109193). During pregnancy, clinical research shows that folic acid supplementation does not decrease the risk of pre-delivery anemia or low hemoglobin levels (91307).
• Age-related cognitive decline. Oral folic acid does not seem to prevent cognitive decline in healthy elderly adults. Details: Most clinical research shows that taking folic acid, alone or in combination with other B vitamins, does not improve cognitive function, including memory, language, or executive function, in elderly adults with age-related cognitive decline (50318,50412,50510). In fact, a large-scale observational study in the US has found that people over 65 years of age who consume large amounts of folic acid (median of 742 mcg daily) have cognitive decline at a rate twice as fast as those consuming smaller amounts (median of 186 mcg daily) (13068). While most research on folic acid for age-related cognitive decline lacks positive findings, many of the studies are small, short-term (<1 year), underpowered to detect significant differences, and not specific to patients with high homocysteine levels. Population research has found that high homocysteine levels are associated with decreased cognition in older adults, suggesting that using folic acid to lower homocysteine levels might mitigate cognitive decline in these patients (50094). Two long-term clinical trials examining the effects of folic acid in elderly adults with high homocysteine levels show mixed results. A large-scale clinical trial of patients aged 50-70 years from the Netherlands who have high homocysteine levels shows that taking folic acid 800 mcg daily for 3 years increases memory, information processing, and other measures of cognitive function when compared with placebo (15271). However, another large-scale clinical trial of patients aged 65 years and older from the Netherlands who have high homocysteine levels shows that taking folic acid 400 mcg and vitamin B12 500 mcg daily for 2 years lowers homocysteine levels, but does not appear to improve overall measures of cognitive function, when compared with placebo (90392). The reasons for the discrepant findings in these two studies are not clear but might relate to differences in the dose of folic acid, duration of treatment, and age of patients included.
• Cataracts. Oral folic acid does not seem to reduce cataract development. Details: Clinical research in females with existing cardiovascular disease (CVD) or with risk factors for CVD shows that taking folic acid 2.5 mg, vitamin B6 50 mg, and vitamin B12 1 mg daily for an average of 7.3 years does not reduce the risk of developing cataracts. Furthermore, the risk of cataract extraction was increased by 28% in these patients (96149).
• Diarrhea. Oral folic acid does not seem to reduce the risk of diarrhea, and might even increase the incidence of diarrhea in children. Details: In children aged 6-30 months at risk of malnourishment, clinical research shows that taking a nutritional supplement (Nutriset Ltd) enriched in folic acid 75-150 mcg, with or without vitamin B12 0.9-1.8 mcg, daily for 6 months does not reduce the incidence of diarrhea when compared with placebo. Enrichment with folic acid, with or without vitamin B12, actually seems to increase the likelihood of having more episodes of both persistent diarrhea and diarrhea lasting over 3 days (90391).
• Fall prevention. Oral folic acid does not seem to reduce the risk of falls. Details: Clinical research shows that taking a combination of B vitamins, including folic acid 400 mcg and vitamin B12 500 mcg daily, for 2 years, does not prevent falls when compared with placebo in elderly individuals also taking vitamin D (96148).
• Fetal and premature infant mortality. Oral vitamin B12 does not seem prevent mortality in premature infants. Details: Clinical research shows that supplementation with folic acid during pregnancy does not decrease the risk of miscarriage, stillbirth, or neonatal death (91307,96156).
• Leukemia. Oral vitamin B12 does not seem to reduce the risk for pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Details: A meta-analysis of results from two case-control studies has found that increased folate intake during pregnancy is not associated with a reduced risk of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (50247).
• Male infertility. Oral folic acid does not seem to improve sperm parameters or pregnancy rates in males with infertility. Details: Some small clinical studies show that taking folic acid, alone or with zinc, increases sperm count in males with idiopathic infertility or in males with a grade III varicocele (9334,90194). However, another small study in males with asthenozoospermia shows that taking folic acid 5 mg, selenium 200 mcg, and vitamin E 400 IU daily for 3 months does not improve sperm parameters when compared with placebo (104907). Furthermore, there seems to be no improvement in clinical outcomes. One large, high-quality clinical study in males with idiopathic infertility shows that taking folic acid 5 mg with zinc 30 mg daily for 6 months does not improve sperm morphology, pregnancy rate, or live birth rate when compared with placebo (102085). Folic acid has also been evaluated in combination with other ingredients. A retrospective study in males with or without varicocele-related infertility suggests that taking a specific combination product containing folic acid 0.2 mg, vitamin C, zinc, L-carnitine fumarate, acetyl-L-carnitine, coenzyme Q10, selenium, and vitamin B12 (Proxeed Plus, Sigma-Tau) twice daily for 6 months is associated with improvements in sperm count, sperm concentration, and sperm motility when compared to baseline. Improvement in semen parameters were greatest in subjects with more severe varicoceles (111296). The validity of this study is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Osteoporosis. Oral folic acid does not seem to reduce the risk of osteoporotic fractures. Details: Clinical research in elderly adults or adults with a history of cerebrovascular disease shows that taking vitamin B12 500 mcg and folic acid 0.4-2 mg, with or without vitamin B6 25 mg, daily for 2-3 years does not seem to reduce the risk for osteoporotic fractures when compared with placebo (90377,90393). A 5-7 year follow-up of this research has also found no benefit (103981).
• Physical performance. Oral folic acid does not seem to improve physical performance in older adults. Details: Clinical research shows that taking a combination of B vitamins, including folic acid 400 mcg and vitamin B12 500 mcg daily for 2 years, does not improve hand strength or improve performance such as walking when compared with placebo in elderly individuals also taking vitamin D (96148).
• Pre-eclampsia. Oral folic acid does not seem to prevent pre-eclampsia in pregnant patients. Details: While the effect of low-dose prenatal folic acid is unclear, high-dose folic acid does not seem to reduce the risk of pre-eclampsia. Some population research has found that low-dose folic acid is associated with a 22% reduced odds of pre-eclampsia, while other research has found no association (91308,99370,99372,110447). A large clinical trial evaluating high-dose folic acid in pregnancies at risk for pre-eclampsia shows that taking 4 mg daily, starting at 8-16 weeks of gestation and continuing until delivery, does not reduce the risk of pre-eclampsia when compared with placebo (103929). A secondary analysis of this study in twin pregnancies has also found no benefit with high-dose folic acid supplementation (103977).
• Respiratory tract infections. Oral folic acid does not seem to prevent respiratory tract infections. Details: Clinical research in children aged 6-30 months at risk of malnourishment shows that taking a nutritional supplement (Nutriset Ltd) enriched in folic acid 75-150 mcg, with or without vitamin B12 0.9-1.8 mcg, daily for 6 months does not reduce the incidence of lower respiratory infections when compared with a supplement not enriched with folic acid and vitamin B12 (90391).

LIKELY INEFFECTIVE

• Colorectal adenoma. Oral folic acid does not prevent colorectal adenomas. Details: Although some population research and one clinical study has found that high folate intake is associated with reduced colorectal adenoma risk (2142,2143,91303), most clinical research does not support this finding. Clinical research shows that taking a combination of B vitamins, including folic acid 2.5 mg, vitamin B6 50 mg, and vitamin B12 1 mg daily for up to 9.2 years, does not reduce the risk of colorectal adenoma in females at high risk of cardiovascular disease when compared with placebo (90389). Other clinical research suggests that taking folic acid does not reduce the occurrence or recurrence of adenomas or incidence of advanced adenomas (34596,50241,50265,50369,50394,50449,50522). Furthermore, treatment with folic acid for more than 3 years seems to be associated with an increased risk of advanced adenomatous lesions (50378).
• Fragile X syndrome. Oral folic acid does not improve symptoms in children with fragile X syndrome. Details: Clinical research shows that taking folic acid orally does not improve symptoms of fragile X syndrome (2155,2156,2157,2158,2159,2160,50575).
• Preterm labor. Oral folic acid does not seem to reduce the risk of preterm birth. Details: Meta-analyses of clinical research show that supplementation with folic acid 200 mcg to 5 mg during pregnancy does not decrease the risk of preterm birth (91307,96155). An observational study in patients with and without epilepsy found that folic acid supplementation during pregnancy was associated with a lower odds of preterm birth in patients receiving antiseizure medications; however, no link between folic acid and preterm labor was reported in patients without epilepsy or in those with epilepsy not receiving antiseizure medications (110447).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Abdominal wall defects. It is unclear if oral folic acid helps to prevent abdominal wall defects in newborns. Details: Observational research in a population in northern China has found that taking folic acid supplements until the end of the first trimester modestly reduces the risk of abdominal wall defects and the risk of omphalocele, specifically, in the newborn when compared with not taking folic acid. However, this association was not found in a population in southern China (109191). These differing outcomes may be related to the lower dietary folate intakes in northern China.
• Acne. Oral folic acid has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults and children with inflammatory acne shows that taking 1-4 tablets of a specific product (NicAzel, Elorac Inc.) containing folic acid, vitamin B6, nicotinamide, azelaic acid, zinc, and copper for 8 weeks reduces inflammatory lesions and improves appearance in 88% and 81% of patients, respectively, when compared with baseline (90800).
• Age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Oral folic acid has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A large-scale clinical study shows that taking folic acid 2.5 mg, vitamin B6 50 mg, and vitamin B12 1 mg daily reduces the risk of developing AMD in females over 40 years of age with a history of cardiovascular disease (CVD) or with risk factors for CVD. Those who took this combination for an average of 7.3 years had a 34% reduced risk of developing AMD and a 41% reduced risk of visually significant AMD when compared with placebo (14620). It is unclear if this effect is due to folic acid, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Age-related testosterone deficiency. Folic acid has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A very small clinical study in males with overweight or obesity, mild erectile dysfunction, and normal to low androgen levels shows that taking a combination product containing folic acid 400 mcg, alpha-lipoic acid, myo-inositol, and apple (Sinopol Forte) increases testosterone, luteinizing hormone, and measures of erectile dysfunction but not follicle-stimulating hormone or sperm parameters when compared to baseline (111674). The validity of these effects is limited by the small sample size and the lack of a comparator group, and it is unclear if these effects are due to folic acid, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Alzheimer disease. It is unclear if oral folic acid reduces the risk of developing this condition. Details: Low levels of folate and high levels of homocysteine have been linked to a greater risk of Alzheimer disease (50094). Also, some observational studies have found that higher intake of folate from the diet and supplements in elderly adults is associated with a reduced risk of developing Alzheimer disease when compared with lower intake (13165,15270). One small clinical trial in patients with Alzheimer disease who are taking cholinesterase inhibitors shows that taking folic acid 1 mg daily for 6 months increases the likelihood of treatment response, classified as global improvement in behavioral and/or functional status with no decline in mental status scores, by 78% to 87% when compared with placebo (50246). Also, preliminary clinical research in patients with probable Alzheimer disease who are not consuming a folate-fortified diet shows that taking vitamin B12 50 mcg daily plus folic acid 1.2 mg daily for 6 months modestly improves some measures of cognitive performance and decreases levels of homocysteine when compared with placebo (107150). However, not all research agrees. Clinical research in patients with probable Alzheimer disease using routine medications shows that taking folic acid 5 mg, vitamin B12 1 mg, and vitamin B6 25 mg daily for 18 months does not have a beneficial effect on cognitive function or the severity of disease when compared with placebo (50319). However, all patients in this study were also consuming a folate-fortified diet.
• Angioplasty. Oral folic acid has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Some evidence suggests that folic acid 1 mg, vitamin B12 400 mcg, and pyridoxine 10 mg daily can decrease the rate of restenosis in patients treated with balloon angioplasty (8009,9412). However, this combination does not seem to be as effective for reducing restenosis in patients after coronary stenting (8009). An intravenous loading dose of folic acid, vitamin B6, and vitamin B12 followed by oral administration of folic acid 1.2 mg, vitamin B6 48 mg, and vitamin B12 60 mcg daily after bare metal coronary stenting also does not seem to reduce restenosis and might actually increase restenosis (12150,12151). Due to the lack of evidence of benefit and potential for harm, this combination of vitamins should not be recommended for patients receiving coronary stents (12151).
• Atopic dermatitis (eczema). It is unclear if oral folic acid during pregnancy reduces the risk of eczema in the child. Details: Observational research has found that consuming both iron and folic acid supplements during pregnancy is associated with a four-fold reduced risk for developing atopic dermatitis in the child. However, use of either iron or folic acid supplementation alone is not associated with an effect on the child's risk for atopic dermatitis (102387).
• Autism spectrum disorder. It is unclear if oral folic acid intake during pregnancy reduces the risk of autism spectrum disorder in the child. Details: A meta-analysis of population research has found that consumption of folic acid of at least 400 mcg daily from both diet and supplements during pregnancy is associated with a 45% reduced risk of autism in the child at 2-15 years of age. Also, supplementation with folic acid during the prenatal to early period of pregnancy is associated with an approximate 43% reduced risk of autism in the child. This association did not differ between countries with or without a folate fortification program (109198). An individual population study has also found that prenatal folic acid supplementation initiated the first day of the last menstrual period before conception is associated with a 39% reduced odds of autism in the child at age 3.3-10.2 years when compared to pregnancies without folic acid supplementation (91324).
• Beta-thalassemia. There is limited evidence on the oral use of folic acid for beta-thalassemia minor. Details: Patients with beta-thalassemia minor may experience decreased muscle strength and increased bone or muscle pain. A small clinical study in children with this condition shows that taking folic acid 1 mg, with or without L-carnitine 50 mg/kg, daily for 3 months reduces bone pain by 64% to 84% and increases the number of stairs climbed by 2- to 5-fold when compared with baseline (90631). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a control group.
• Bipolar disorder. It is unclear if adding oral folic acid to conventional bipolar therapy further improves symptoms. Details: Some clinical evidence suggests that folic acid does not improve the antidepressant effects of lithium in patients with bipolar disorder (50566). However, other clinical evidence suggests that taking folic acid in combination with valproate during the acute phase of mania improves the effects of valproate (50357).
• Breast cancer. It is unclear if oral folic acid reduces breast cancer risk. Details: Some older population research suggests that increased intake or levels of folic acid alone does not affect the risk of breast cancer or breast cancer-related mortality (50218,50224). However, in a specific group of women who also consume high amounts of dietary methionine, cyanocobalamin (vitamin B12), or pyridoxine (vitamin B6), dietary intake of folate is associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer (9328,50224). Also, more recent population research has found that folic acid plus folate dietary intakes between 153-400 mcg are associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer. This risk is further reduced in those who drink relatively large amounts of alcohol (90794). Folate intakes greater than 400 mcg daily do not appear to be protective against breast cancer (90794).
• Cancer. It is unclear if oral folic acid prevents cancer. Details: A large cohort study of children born to mothers with epilepsy on antiseizure medications suggests that prenatal folic acid exposure of 1 mg daily or more, at an average of 4.3 mg daily, is associated with a 2.7-fold greater risk of pediatric cancer when compared with children born to mothers with epilepsy but without prenatal exposure to high-dose folic acid. Additionally, this risk is not present in children of mothers without epilepsy taking high-dose folate (112103). It is unclear how maternal epilepsy, antiseizure medications, and folate interact to increase the risk of pediatric cancers. However, in the absence of clear guidelines, mothers with epilepsy should take no more than 4 mg of folic acid daily (112101,112102).
• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Although oral folic acid does not seem to prevent most CVD events, some research suggests that increased dietary folic acid might lower the risk of stroke and CVD-related mortality in patients at high risk for CVD. Details: In 2001, prior to the publication of the highest quality research on this topic, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim stating that, as part of a well-balanced diet that is low in saturated fat and cholesterol, folic acid, vitamin B6, and vitamin B12 may reduce the risk of vascular disease (102368). Meta-analyses of available research show that folic acid might lower the risk of stroke in patients with CVD (97619,102386,107136). Some clinical research shows that taking folic acid reduces the risk of CVD by 15% in patients with kidney failure or chronic kidney disease (50444,91311). However, most research shows that folic acid supplementation, alone or in combination with vitamin B6 and vitamin B12, does not improve endothelial function or reduce the risk of death or CVD events in patients with existing hyperhomocysteinemia, coronary heart disease, CVD, kidney disease, or prior stroke, despite having a homocysteine-lowering effect (9313,9322,11337,11387,13482,50437) (50512,50527,96154,96147,97619,102386). Some population research has evaluated adults at high risk for CVD. This research has found that dietary folate intake of at least 382 mcg daily is associated with a modest reduction in CVD-related mortality and possibly all-cause mortality. Consuming folic acid as a component of fortified food in doses of more than 251 mcg daily is associated with a modest reduction in CVD-related mortality. Conversely, folic acid supplementation is associated with a higher risk of CVD and overall mortality, and there is a J-shaped association between folate intake, serum folate levels, and red blood cell folate levels, with both CVD-related and all-cause mortality (109199).
• Cervical cancer. It is unclear if oral folic acid prevents cervical cancer. Details: Epidemiological evidence has found that increasing folate intake from dietary and supplement sources, along with thiamine, riboflavin, and vitamin B12, might decrease the risk of precancerous cervical lesions (11074).
• Child development. It is unclear if oral folic acid supplementation during pregnancy improves child development. Details: Clinical research in Northern Ireland shows that taking folic acid 400 mcg daily starting in the 14th week of gestation and continuing until the end of pregnancy improves word reasoning in the child at 7 years of age when compared with placebo. When compared with a historical cohort from Britain, folic acid supplementation was associated with an increase in full scale IQ, verbal IQ, performance IQ, and general language at 7 years of age (102385). At age 11, benefits in word reasoning were no longer significant. However, there were modest benefits in some measures of processing speed when compared with placebo. Verbal comprehension was modestly improved in females, but not males (109192). Observational research in pregnant individuals and their children in Spain has found that taking less than 400 mcg of folic acid daily during pregnancy is associated with lower mental alertness scores in children at ages 7-9 years when compared with folic acid 400-999 mcg daily, while taking folic acid 1000 mcg or more daily during pregnancy was associated with improvements in some measures of working memory in the children. However, no relationship between folic acid dosing and most other measures of cognitive function was identified (110449).
• Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Although there is interest in using oral or injectable folic acid for CFS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of folic acid for this condition.
• Chronic kidney disease (CKD). While adding oral folic acid to enalapril might slow CKD progression, adding folic acid to high-dose vitamin B12 does not seem to be beneficial. Details: Clinical research in adults with hypertension and CKD shows that taking enalapril with folic acid 800 mcg for a median of 4.4 years reduces the risk of worsening kidney function by 21% and slows the rate of kidney function decline by 44% when compared with enalapril alone (96153). However, clinical research does not support the use of folic acid in patients with CKD when used in combination with high-dose vitamin B12 (cyanocobalamin). Vitamin B12 might increase the risk of negative outcomes (50253,50409,96150). More research is needed to determine the benefits of folic acid when used alone.
• Colorectal cancer. It is unclear if oral folic acid prevents colorectal cancer. Details: Although the majority of population research suggests that taking folic acid orally from dietary and supplemental sources reduces the risk of colorectal cancer (505,2140,2144,2145,2250,6271,9325,9326,50109,50427,50450)(91306,91323,96160,109188,110450), clinical evidence in general is not supportive. Most clinical research and meta-analyses of clinical trials suggest that taking folic acid from dietary or supplemental sources does not reduce the risk of colorectal cancer (2141,34596,50394). The reason for this discrepancy is unclear. Some observational research suggests that an inverse association between folate intake and risk of colorectal cancer was not apparent until at least 12 years after baseline folate intake was determined (109188). A meta-analysis of observational studies suggests that the benefits of folic acid supplementation on colorectal cancer risk might be limited to patients with moderate to high alcohol consumption (110450). Other clinical evidence suggests that the beneficial effect of folic acid may be limited to colon, but not rectal, cancer (21501). Furthermore, the beneficial effect for colon cancer may be limited to only certain subtypes. For instance, females with folate intake of at least 400 mcg daily seem to have a 46% reduction in the risk of p53-overexpressing colon cancer, but not p53-negative tumors, when compared with those who consume less than 200 mcg daily (21300). Also, the source of folic acid may influence its effects. Some observational research suggests that dietary folate, but not folic acid supplementation, reduces the risk of colon cancer (21501).
• Congenital heart disease. It is unclear if oral folic acid prevents congenital heart disease. Details: The exact cause of congenital heart disease is unknown but is thought to be a combination of genetic and environmental factors. Population research has found that supplementation with folic acid or folic acid-containing prenatal vitamins during pregnancy is associated with up to a 40% lower risk of congenital heart defects in newborns (99373).
• Dementia. It is unclear if oral folic acid is beneficial for the prevention or treatment of dementia. Details: While some preliminary research shows that folic acid might aid in the prevention and treatment of Alzheimer disease (13165,15270,50246,90374), two small clinical trials show that taking folic acid 15-20 mg daily for 10-12 weeks does not seem to improve cognitive function or the severity of dementia in patients with various forms of dementia, including vascular dementia, Lewy body dementia, probable Alzheimer disease, or dementia due to other causes (50062,50597).
• Diabetes. Small clinical studies suggest that oral folic acid does not improve glycemic control. Details: Meta-analyses of small clinical trials in patients with type 2 diabetes show that folic acid does not reduce glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) when compared with placebo (50528,109197). Another small clinical study in patients with diabetes who are stabilized on metformin and/or a sulfonylurea shows that taking folic acid 5 mg daily for 8 weeks does not affect HbA1C when compared with placebo (104917). The validity of this study is limited by its small size and lack of blinding. Conversely, a meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking folate modestly reduces fasting blood glucose and insulin levels, as well as measures of insulin resistance, when compared with placebo or no intervention (109197). There was no clear relationship between these changes and the dose or duration of folate. However, the studies included in this analysis evaluated multiple patient populations; the effect of folate in patients with diabetes, specifically, is unclear. Beyond glycemic control, some research has assessed the impact of dietary folate intake on cardiovascular risk in patients with diabetes. An observational study in Chinese adults with type 2 diabetes has found that dietary intake of folate in the highest quartile is associated with 68% lower odds of developing cardiovascular disease, defined as a non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, or hospitalization for unstable angina, when compared with folate intake in the lowest quartile (110452). Folic acid has also been evaluated in gestational diabetes. A meta-analysis of 20 studies shows that serum and red blood cell (RBC) folate levels are higher in patients with gestational diabetes than without gestational diabetes. Subgroup analysis suggests that patients with gestational diabetes have higher serum and RBC folate levels in the second trimester than in those without gestational diabetes, while RBC folate levels in patients with gestational diabetes were higher in the first trimester than those without gestational diabetes. Overall, higher serum folate levels are associated with a slight increase in the odds of gestational diabetes when compared with lower serum folate levels (112107).
• Diabetic neuropathy. Oral folic acid has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with diabetic neuropathy shows that taking a combination of B vitamins, including folic acid (L-methylfolate), vitamin B12 (methylcobalamin), and vitamin B6 (pyridoxal-5'-phosphate), for 24 weeks does not improve neural dysfunction based on vibration perception, but does seem to improve total neuropathy symptoms, when compared with placebo. These symptoms, which include both sensation and pain, decreased by 25% with the B vitamin combination, compared with only 15% in those taking placebo (90375).
• Epilepsy. It is unclear if oral folic acid reduces seizure frequency. Details: A meta-analysis of preliminary clinical research shows that taking folic acid does not reduce seizure frequency in patients with epilepsy (50124). However, there is some speculation that folate deficiency might be linked to increased seizure frequency. A preliminary clinical study in folate-deficient children with epilepsy shows that taking folic acid 5 mg daily for 3 months reduces seizure frequency when compared to baseline, but not when compared with a control group that is not deficient in folate (99371).
• Erectile dysfunction (ED). Oral folic acid has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A very small clinical study in males with mild erectile dysfunction, overweight or obesity, and normal to low androgen levels shows that taking a combination product containing folic acid 400 mcg, alpha-lipoic acid, myo-inositol, and apple (Sinopol Forte, Laborest) improves measures of erectile dysfunction when compared to baseline (111674). The validity of these effects is limited by the small sample size and the lack of a comparator group, and it is unclear if these effects are due to folic acid, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Esophageal cancer. Higher dietary folate intake is associated with a lower risk of esophageal cancer. Details: One meta-analysis of observational research has found that higher levels of dietary folate are associated with a 34% lower risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and a 50% lower risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma when compared with low levels of dietary folate (50208). Another meta-analysis of observational research has found that consuming high amounts of folate is associated with a 36% decrease in the odds of esophageal cancer when compared with lower dietary folate intake (100950).
• Fenofibrate (Tricor)-induced hyperhomocysteinemia. Folic acid seems to attenuate increases in homocysteine in people taking fenofibrate. Details: A small open-label clinical trial in patients taking fenofibrate shows that adding folic acid 10 mg every other day might reduce elevated plasma homocysteine levels by up to 59% when compared with taking fenofibrate alone (9321).
• Gastric cancer. It is unclear if oral folic acid reduces gastric cancer risk. Details: Observational research has found that taking folic acid reduces the risk of gastric cardia adenocarcinoma by 17% and the risk of noncardia gastric cancer by 33%, but does not reduce the risk of gastric cancer overall (50208). Also, a meta-analysis of 13 small clinical studies in patients with gastric precancerous conditions shows that taking folic acid 20-30 mg daily for 3-6 months improves gastric mucosal atrophy and intestinal metaplasia but does not seem to improve symptoms when compared with a control (110448). Whether these findings are associated with a lower risk of gastric cancer is unclear.
• Gout. It is unclear if oral folic acid reduces the risk for gout. Details: An observational study has found that increased dietary folate intake is associated with a lower incidence of gout (50454).
• Head and neck cancer. It is unclear if oral folic acid is beneficial for head and neck cancer prevention. Details: Population research has found that the highest intake of dietary folate is associated with a 50% reduced risk of head and neck cancer when compared with the lowest intake of folate. Each 100 mcg increase per day seems to reduce the risk by about 4% (96151).
• Hearing loss. It is unclear if oral folic acid prevents hearing loss. Details: Low levels of serum folate seem to be a risk factor for sudden sensorineural hearing loss in adults (21283). Observational research in females has found that serum folate levels in the lowest quintile are associated with a 19% increased risk for hearing loss when compared with levels in the second quintile. Also, folate levels in the highest quintile are associated with a 12% lower risk of hearing loss when compared with the second quintile (109807). A clinical study in older adults from the Netherlands shows that taking folic acid 800 mcg daily for 3 years slows the decline of age-related low-threshold hearing loss when compared with placebo (15163). However, at the time of this study, folate enrichment of foods was not allowed in the Netherlands. As a result, baseline folate levels in this study population were about 50% lower than in the US population. The effect of folic acid supplementation in people with higher baseline folate levels is unclear.
• Infertility. It is unclear if oral 5-methyltetrahydrofolate (5-MTHF) in combination with vitamin B6 and vitamin B12 is more beneficial than folic acid alone for increasing pregnancy rate in females undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART). Details: Retrospective research from Italy suggests that taking 5-MTHF 400 mcg, vitamin B12 5 mcg, and vitamin B6 3 mg daily results in clinical pregnancy and live birth rates of approximately 60% and 49%, respectively, compared with 45% and 35% of those taking folic acid 400 mcg daily. A sub-analysis suggests that beneficial effects on pregnancy rates are limited to individuals aged less than 40 years (109189). The findings from this study are limited by its retrospective design. Also, it is unclear if these findings are generalizable to countries with folate fortification.
• Kidney failure. It is unclear if oral folic acid is beneficial in patients with kidney failure. Details: Because hemodialysis removes folate from the body, there is concern that folate deficiency may cause complications in patients with kidney failure receiving hemodialysis. Observational research in Taiwanese patients with kidney failure undergoing hemodialysis has found that taking folic acid 5 mg daily for an average of 5.8 years is associated with a 31% lower risk of arteriovenous access thrombosis when compared with folic acid 5 mg weekly. However, daily folic acid supplementation was not linked to a lower risk of cardiovascular events, cancer, or mortality when compared with weekly folic acid (110120). Oral folic acid has also been evaluated in combination with other ingredients. A small, low-quality clinical study in adults with kidney failure undergoing regular hemodialysis shows that taking oral folic acid 30 mg daily with thiamine 90 mg daily for 96 weeks reduces overall mortality by 67% and improves cognitive scores by 31% when compared with no intervention (107724). It is unclear if these findings are due to folic acid, thiamine, or the combination.
• Lometrexol toxicity. While oral folic acid might reduce lometrexol toxicity, intravenous folic acid does not seem to help. Details: In a phase I trial, intravenous folic acid 5-25 mg administered 1 hour or 3 hours prior to lometrexol 15-30 mg/m2 every 3 weeks does not seem to reduce cumulative lometrexol toxicity (2161). However, in a phase II study, taking oral folic acid 3 mg/m2 daily in addition to lometrexol 10 mg/m2 weekly seems to attenuate cumulative toxicity and improve its tolerability in cancer patients (104948).
• Low birth weight. It is unclear if oral folic acid supplementation during pregnancy reduces the risk of a low birth weight. Details: Clinical research shows that supplementation with folic acid 200 mcg to 5 mg daily during pregnancy increases mean birth weight when compared with placebo (91307). Furthermore, some population research has found that pre- or peri-conception folic acid supplementation, usually 400 mcg daily, is associated with a reduced risk of a child born small-for-gestational age. However post-conception folic acid supplementation is not associated with reduced risk (91304,103983). An observational study in pregnant Chinese patients found that supplementation with folic acid is associated with a 20% lower odds of low birth weight when compared with no supplementation. This association was observed when folic acid was used both before conception and during pregnancy for at least 24 weeks or during pregnancy only for at least 12 weeks. Increased dietary folate intake was not linked to a lower risk of low-birth-weight infants (110446). However, other observational research has found no association between folic acid supplementation during pregnancy and the risk for small-for-gestational age births (110447).
• Lung cancer. It is unclear if oral folic acid reduces lung cancer risk. Details: There does not appear to be a relationship between deficiency of folate and lung cancer (9454). However, consuming at least 130.4 mcg of folate per 1000 kcal daily seems to reduce the risk of lung cancer by 40% in former smokers when compared to those with lower dietary folate intake (50065).
• Melanoma. It is unclear if oral folic acid reduces melanoma risk. Details: Population research has found that folic acid supplementation of 2-2.5 mg daily in combination with vitamin B6 and vitamin B12 is linked with a 53% reduced risk of melanoma (91312).
• Metabolic syndrome. Although there is interest in using oral folic acid for metabolic syndrome, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of folic acid for this condition.
• Nitrate tolerance. It is unclear if oral folic acid helps to prevent the development of tolerance to treatment with nitroglycerin. Details: Some clinical evidence suggests that taking folic acid 1 mg daily for 1 week does not prevent the development of nitroglycerin-induced endothelial dysfunction or tolerance in healthy individuals (50442). However, other research suggests that taking folic acid 10 mg daily for 1 week prevents nitric oxide synthase dysfunction caused by continuous nitroglycerin (9316).
• Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). It is unclear if oral folic acid is beneficial for NAFLD. Details: A cross-sectional analysis suggests that adults with NAFLD have lower levels of serum folate and its major component 5-MTHF when compared with healthy controls. Additionally, adults with NAFLD seem to consume less supplementary and dietary folate when compared with healthy controls. Overall, serum folate levels are negatively associated with the risk of NAFLD, and inadequate folate intake is associated with an increased risk of NAFLD (112104).
• Oral clefts. It is unclear if oral folic acid reduces the risk of oral clefts in infants. Details: Observational research has found that maternal folic acid supplementation is associated with an up to 49% reduced risk of cleft lip with or without cleft palate (50220,104921). Furthermore, a large clinical trial in pregnancies at-risk for oral cleft suggests that taking a higher dose of folic acid 4 mg from pre-conception until the end of the first trimester results in a similar oral cleft recurrence rate of 2.5%, compared with a 2.9% recurrence with a lower dose of folic acid (400 mcg). Both doses demonstrate a lower incidence of oral clefts when compared with historical rates of 6.3% (91322). Although there is speculation that genetic markers of folate status impact the effect of folic acid on orofacial cleft incidence, the current data do not show a relationship (104921).
• Overall mortality. It is unclear if oral folic acid reduces the risk of overall mortality. Details: Observational research in US adults has found that dietary intake of folic acid in the highest quintile is associated with a 14% to 23% lower risk of all-cause mortality and a 41% to 47% lower risk of cardiovascular mortality when compared with the lowest quintile of dietary folic acid intake (110451).
• Pancreatic cancer. It is unclear if oral folic acid reduces pancreatic cancer risk. Details: Consuming greater than 280 mcg daily of dietary folate is associated with a decreased risk of exocrine pancreatic cancer (9327). A meta-analysis of case-control and cohort studies suggests that consuming higher amounts of dietary folate reduces the risk of pancreatic cancer by 51% compared to low levels of dietary folate (50208). However, another meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies suggests that folate/folic acid intake does not significantly affect the overall risk of pancreatic cancer (50499). The contradictory results may be associated with the form of intake or may be related to the gender of the participants. A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that dietary folate, but not folic acid, significantly reduces the risk of pancreatic cancer (50387). Also, one meta-analysis of observational studies has found that high dietary folate decreases the risk of pancreatic cancer in females, but not males (50387).
• Peripheral neuropathy. Oral folic acid has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows taking a combination of folic acid 400 mcg, vitamin B12 3 mcg, and uridine monophosphate 50 mg daily (Keltican) for 60 days reduces pain associated with peripheral neuropathy. Use of this product reduces pain intensity by approximately 44%, with loss of burning pain in approximately 50% of patients, strong tingling or pricking in approximately 57% of patients, strong pain attacks in 92% of patients, and numbness in 90% of patients when compared with baseline. Radiating pain and the use of concomitant medications are also reduced (90384). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group. Furthermore, it is unclear if the benefits are due to folic acid, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Pharyngeal cancer. It is unclear if oral folic acid reduces pharyngeal cancer risk. Details: Population research has found that intake of folic acid and folate from natural, fortified, and supplemented sources, may protect against oropharyngeal cancer. Intake of at least 258-816 mcg total folate/folic acid reduces the odds by 35% when compared with intakes of less than 344 mcg. Furthermore, folate/folic acid may be more beneficial for oral cancer versus pharyngeal cancer and in heavy alcohol users versus non users or light users (91302).
• Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). It is unclear if oral folic acid is beneficial for PCOS. Details: One clinical study in overweight or obese patients with PCOS shows that taking folate 1 mg or 5 mg daily for 8 weeks modestly reduces levels of homocysteine, as well as insulin resistance, when compared with placebo. However, only the 5 mg dose modestly reduces insulin, total cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels. Neither dose appears to affect fasting plasma glucose, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, or triglyceride levels when compared with placebo (109200). Other clinical research in patients with PCOS taking metformin shows that taking folate 400 mcg daily for 6 months does not affect glycemic parameters, plasma lipid levels, or hormone levels when compared with placebo (109194). The reasons for discrepancies between studies are unclear but may relate to patient characteristics. One study included only overweight or obese individuals with at least two of the three PCOS criteria, whereas the other study limited enrollment to patients in any weight category but with all three PCOS criteria (109194,109200).
• Pregnancy-induced hypertension. It is unclear if oral folic acid reduces the risk of hypertension during pregnancy. Details: Population research has found that taking folic acid during pregnancy is not associated with a reduced risk of gestational hypertension (91308,99370,99372).
• Restless legs syndrome (RLS). Although there is interest in using oral folic acid for RLS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of folic acid for this condition.
• Schizophrenia. Oral folic acid has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research shows that taking a combination of folic acid 2 mg and vitamin B12 400 mcg daily for 16 weeks improves negative symptoms when compared with placebo in patients with schizophrenia who have persistent symptoms and a specific genetic variant of the folate transporter gene FOLHI. This variant normally results in reduced folate absorption. However, in patients without this genetic variant, folate is not beneficial with respect to negative symptom improvement (90387).
• Sickle cell disease. Oral folic acid has only been evaluated in combination with other B vitamins; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with sickle cell disease shows that taking vitamin B12 4.2-6 mcg, folic acid 700 mcg, and vitamin B6 4.2-6 mg daily might lower homocysteine levels. However, it is unknown if this will reduce the risk of endothelial damage in these patients (9324).
• Suicidal ideation. It is unclear if oral folic acid reduces the risk of suicidal ideation or suicide attempts. Details: One observational study has evaluated the association between folic acid supplementation and suicidal events in patients with various underlying conditions, including 12% with depression, 15% with anxiety, and 46% with pain. This within-person cohort study found that filling a prescription for folic acid 0.4-5 mg daily, either alone or as part of a multivitamin, is associated with a 44% reduced rate of suicidal events during the months after the prescription when compared with the months without the prescription. For the 48% of patients who received folic acid 1 mg daily, each additional month of taking the prescription was associated with a 5% decrease in suicidal events (109201). Prospective clinical research is needed to confirm any benefits of folic acid and to determine whether baseline folate deficiency plays a role in these outcomes. More evidence is needed to rate folic acid for these uses.

(Read more about FOLIC ACID)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally or intravenously and appropriately. Calcium is safe when used in appropriate doses (7555,12928,12946,95817). However, excessive doses should be avoided. The Institute of Medicine sets the daily tolerable upper intake level (UL) for calcium according to age as follows: Age 0-6 months, 1000 mg; 6-12 months, 1500 mg; 1-8 years, 2500 mg; 9-18 years, 3000 mg; 19-50 years, 2500 mg; 51+ years, 2000 mg (17506). Doses over these levels can increase the risk of side effects such as kidney stone, hypercalciuria, hypercalcemia, and milk-alkali syndrome. There has also been concern that calcium intake may be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and coronary heart disease (CHD), including myocardial infarction (MI). Some clinical research suggests that calcium intake, often in amounts over the recommended daily intake level of 1000-1300 mg daily for adults, is associated with an increased risk of CVD, CHD, and MI (16118,17482,91350,107233). However, these studies, particularly meta-analyses, have been criticized for excluding trials in which calcium was administered with vitamin D (94137). Many of these trials also only included postmenopausal females. Other analyses report conflicting results, and have not shown that calcium intake affects the risk of CVD, CHD, or MI (92994,93533,97308,107231). Advise patients not to consume more than the recommended daily intake of 1000-1200 mg per day and to consider total calcium intake from both dietary and supplemental sources (17484). Also, advise patients taking calcium supplements to take calcium along with vitamin D (93533).

POSSIBLY UNSAFE ...when used orally in excessive doses. The National Academy of Medicine sets the daily tolerable upper intake level (UL) for calcium according to age as follows: 19-50 years, 2500 mg; 51 years and older, 2000 mg (17506). Doses over these levels can increase the risk of side effects such as kidney stones, hypercalciuria, hypercalcemia, and milk-alkali syndrome. There has also been concern that calcium intake may be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and coronary heart disease (CHD), including myocardial infarction (MI). Some clinical research suggests that calcium intake, often in amounts over the recommended daily intake level of 1000-1300 mg daily for adults, is associated with an increased risk of CVD, CHD, and MI (16118,17482,91350,107233). However, these studies, particularly meta-analyses, have been criticized for excluding trials in which calcium was administered with vitamin D (94137). Many of these trials also only included postmenopausal females. Other analyses report conflicting results, and have not shown that calcium intake affects the risk of CVD, CHD, or MI (92994,93533,97308,107231). Advise patients to not consume more than the recommended daily intake of 1000-1200 mg per day and to consider total calcium intake from both dietary and supplemental sources (17484). Also, advise patients taking calcium supplements to take calcium along with vitamin D (93533).

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. Calcium is safe when used in appropriate doses (17506).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in excessive doses. The Institute of Medicine sets the daily tolerable upper intake level (UL) for calcium according to age as follows: 0-6 months, 1000 mg; 6-12 months, 1500 mg; 1-8 years, 2500 mg; 9-18 years, 3000 mg (17506). Doses over these levels can increase the risk of side effects such as kidney stones, hypercalciuria, hypercalcemia, and milk-alkali syndrome.

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately (945,1586,3263,3264,17506). The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends prescribing oral calcium supplementation 1.5-2 grams daily during pregnancy to those with low dietary calcium intake to prevent pre-eclampsia (97347).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in excessive doses. The Institute of Medicine sets the same daily tolerable upper intake level (UL) for calcium according to age independent of pregnancy status: 9-18 years, 3000 mg; 19-50 years, 2500 mg (17506). Doses over these amounts might increase the risk of neonatal hypocalcemia-induced seizures possibly caused by transient neonatal hypoparathyroidism in the setting of excessive calcium supplementation during pregnancy, especially during the third trimester. Neonatal hypocalcemia is a risk factor for neonatal seizures (97345).

(Read more about CALCIUM)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally or parenterally and appropriately. Folic acid has been safely used in amounts below the tolerable upper intake level (UL). The UL for folic acid is based only on supplemental folic acid and is expressed in mcg folic acid. Dietary folate is not included in UL calculations, as dietary folate consumption has not been associated with adverse effects. The UL for folic acid in adults is 1000 mcg (6241). In cases of megaloblastic anemia resulting from folate deficiency or malabsorption disorders such as sprue, oral doses of 1-5 mg per day can also be used safely until hematologic recovery is documented, as long as vitamin B12 levels are routinely measured (6241,7725,8739).

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when L-5-methyltetrahydrofolate (L-5-MTHF), the reduced form of folate, is used orally and appropriately, short-term. L-5-MTHF has been used with apparent safety at a dose of 416 mcg daily for 16 weeks (104913,104914) and a dose of 113 mcg daily for 24 weeks (104920). A specific L-5-MTHF product (Metafolin, Eprova) has been used with apparent safety at a dose of 1.3 mg daily for 12 weeks (104912).

POSSIBLY UNSAFE ...when used orally in large doses, long-term. Clinical research shows that taking folic acid daily in doses of 800 mcg to 1200 mcg for 3-10 years significantly increases the risk of developing cancer and adverse cardiovascular effects compared to placebo (12150,13482,16822,17041). Doses above 1 mg per day should also be avoided if possible to prevent precipitation or exacerbation of neuropathy related to vitamin B12 deficiency (6241,6242,6245). However, there is contradictory evidence suggesting that higher doses may not be harmful. There is some evidence that doses of 5 mg per day orally for up to 4 months can be used safely if vitamin B12 levels are routinely measured (7725). Also, other clinical research suggests that folic acid supplementation at doses up to 5 mg, usually in combination with vitamin B12, does not increase the risk of cancer when taken for 2-7 years (91312). Very high doses of 15 mg per day can cause significant central nervous system (CNS) and gastrointestinal side effects (505).

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. Folic acid has been safely used in children in amounts below the tolerable upper intake level (UL). The ULs for folic acid are based only on supplemental folic acid and are expressed in mcg folic acid. Dietary folate is not included in UL calculations, as dietary folate consumption has not been associated with adverse effects. The UL for children is: 1-3 years of age, 300 mcg; 4-8 years of age, 400 mcg; 9-13 years of age, 600 mcg; 14-18 years of age, 800 mcg (6241).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY SAFE
when L-5-methyltetrahydrofolate (L-5-MTHF), the reduced form of folate, is used orally and appropriately. One clinical study in infants aged 27 days and younger shows that consuming a formula containing L-5-MTHF (Metafolin, Merck & Cie) 10.4 mcg/100 mL daily has been used with apparent safety for up to 12 weeks (104918).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. Folic acid 300-400 mcg is commonly used during pregnancy for prevention of neural tube defects (8739). Miscarriage rates and negative impacts on fetal growth have not been shown to increase with peri-conception supplemental folic acid intakes of 4 mg per day (91320,91322). However, other research shows that taking more than 5 mg per day during pregnancy may reduce development of cognitive, emotional, and motor skills in infants (91318). Also, the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of folic acid for pregnant or lactating women is 800 mcg daily for those 14-18 years of age and 1000 mcg daily for those 19 years and older (6241).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: POSSIBLY SAFE
when L-5-methyltetrahydrofolate (L-5-MTHF), the reduced form of folate, is used orally and appropriately, short-term. L-5-MTHF has been used with apparent safety at a dose of 416 mcg daily for 16 weeks during lactation. Compared to folic acid, this form seems to further increase the folate concentration of red blood cells, but not breast milk (104913,104914).

(Read more about FOLIC ACID)

ALUMINUM Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium citrate might increase aluminum absorption and toxicity. Other types of calcium do not increase aluminum absorption.  Details Calcium citrate can increase the absorption of aluminum when taken with aluminum hydroxide. The increase in aluminum levels may become toxic, particularly in individuals with kidney disease (21631). However, the effect of calcium citrate on aluminum absorption is due to the citrate anion rather than calcium cation. Calcium acetate does not appear to increase aluminum absorption (93006).

BISPHOSPHONATES Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = C Calcium reduces the absorption of bisphosphonates.  Details Advise patients to take bisphosphonates at least 30 minutes before calcium, but preferably at a different time of day. Calcium supplements decrease absorption of bisphosphonates (12937).

CALCIPOTRIENE (Dovonex) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Taking calcipotriene with calcium might increase the risk for hypercalcemia.  Details Calcipotriene is a vitamin D analog used topically for psoriasis. It can be absorbed in sufficient amounts to cause systemic effects, including hypercalcemia (12938). Theoretically, combining calcipotriene with calcium supplements might increase the risk of hypercalcemia.

CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Unlikely •  Level of Evidence = D Intravenous calcium may decrease the effects of calcium channel blockers; oral calcium is unlikely to have this effect.  Details Intravenous calcium is used to decrease the effects of calcium channel blockers in the management of overdose. Intravenous calcium gluconate has been used before intravenous verapamil (Isoptin) to prevent or reduce the hypotensive effects without affecting the antiarrhythmic effects (6124). But there is no evidence that dietary or supplemental calcium when taken orally interacts with calcium channel blockers (12939,12947).

CEFTRIAXONE (Rocephin) Interaction Rating = Major Do not take this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Co-administration of intravenous calcium and ceftriaxone can result in precipitation of a ceftriaxone-calcium salt in the lungs and kidneys.  Details Avoid administering intravenous calcium in any form, such as parenteral nutrition or Lactated Ringers, within 48 hours of intravenous ceftriaxone. Case reports in neonates show that administering intravenous ceftriaxone and calcium can result in precipitation of a ceftriaxone-calcium salt in the lungs and kidneys. In several cases, neonates have died as a result of this interaction (15794,21632). So far there are no reports in adults; however, there is still concern that this interaction might occur in adults.

DIGOXIN (Lanoxin) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Using intravenous calcium with digoxin might increase the risk of fatal cardiac arrhythmias.  Details Hypercalcemia increases the risk of fatal cardiac arrhythmias with digoxin (12940). However, one retrospective analysis of clinical data suggests that intravenous calcium does not increase the risk of dysrhythmias or mortality in patients receiving digoxin (38960).

DILTIAZEM (Cardizem, others) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, calcium may reduce the therapeutic effects of diltiazem.  Details Hypercalcemia can reduce the effectiveness of verapamil in atrial fibrillation (10574). Theoretically, calcium might increase this risk of hypercalcemia and reduce the effectiveness of diltiazem.

DOLUTEGRAVIR (Tivicay) Interaction Rating = Major Do not take this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium seems to reduce levels of dolutegravir.  Details Advise patients to take dolutegravir either 2 hours before or 6 hours after taking calcium supplements. Pharmacokinetic research suggests that taking calcium carbonate 1200 mg concomitantly with dolutegravir 50 mg reduces plasma levels of dolutegravir by almost 40%. Calcium appears to decrease levels of dolutegravir through chelation (93578).

ELVITEGRAVIR (Vitekta) Interaction Rating = Major Do not take this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium seems to reduce levels of elvitegravir.  Details Advise patients to take elvitegravir either 2 hours before or 2 hours after taking calcium supplements. Pharmacokinetic research suggests that taking calcium along with elvitegravir can reduce blood levels of elvitegravir through chelation (94166).

LEVOTHYROXINE (Synthroid, others) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium seems to reduce the absorption and effectiveness of levothyroxine.  Details Advise patients to take levothyroxine and calcium supplements at least 4 hours apart. Calcium reduces levothyroxine absorption, probably by forming insoluble complexes (5082). Calcium carbonate supplements reduce effectiveness of levothyroxine in patients with hypothyroidism (5081,5082,6137).

LITHIUM Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, concomitant use of calcium and lithium may increase this risk of hypercalcemia.  Details Clinical research suggests that long-term use of lithium may cause hypercalcemia in 10% to 60% of patients (38953). Theoretically, concomitant use of lithium and calcium supplements may further increase this risk.

QUINOLONE ANTIBIOTICS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium seems to reduce the absorption of quinolone antibiotics.  Details Advise patients to take oral quinolones at least 2 hours before or 4-6 hours after calcium supplements or calcium-fortified foods. Taking calcium at the same time as oral quinolones can reduce quinolone absorption. Calcium binds to quinolones in the gut (4412,10339,21638,38570).

RALTEGRAVIR (Isentress) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium may reduce levels of raltegravir.  Details Pharmacokinetic research shows that taking a single dose of calcium carbonate 3000 mg along with raltegravir 400 mg twice daily modestly decreases the mean area under the curve of raltegravir, but the decrease does not necessitate a dose adjustment of raltegravir (94164). However, a case of elevated HIV-1 RNA levels and documented resistance to raltegravir has been reported for a patient taking calcium carbonate 1 gram three times daily plus vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 400 IU three times daily in combination with raltegravir 400 mg twice daily for 11 months. It is thought that calcium reduced raltegravir levels by chelation, leading to treatment failure (94165).

SOTALOL (Betapace) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium seems to reduce the absorption of sotalol.  Details Advise patients to separate doses by at least 2 hours before or 4-6 hours after calcium. Calcium appears to reduce the absorption of sotalol, probably by forming insoluble complexes (10018).

TETRACYCLINE ANTIBIOTICS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = C Calcium seems to reduce the absorption of tetracycline antibiotics.  Details Advise patients to take oral tetracyclines at least 2 hours before, or 4-6 hours after calcium supplements. Taking calcium at the same time as oral tetracyclines can reduce tetracycline absorption. Calcium binds to tetracyclines in the gut (1843).

THIAZIDE DIURETICS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = C Taking calcium along with thiazides might increase the risk of hypercalcemia and renal failure.  Details Thiazides reduce calcium excretion by the kidneys (1902). Using thiazides along with moderately large amounts of calcium carbonate increases the risk of milk-alkali syndrome (hypercalcemia, metabolic alkalosis, renal failure). Patients may need to have their serum calcium levels and/or parathyroid function monitored regularly.

VERAPAMIL (Calan, others) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, calcium may reduce the therapeutic effects of verapamil.  Details Hypercalcemia can reduce the effectiveness of verapamil in atrial fibrillation (10574). Theoretically, use of calcium supplements may increase this risk of hypercalcemia and reduce the effectiveness of verapamil.

(Read more about CALCIUM)

5-FLUOROURACIL Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, high doses of folic acid might increase the toxicity of 5-fluorouracil.  Details Increases in gastrointestinal side effects of 5-fluorouracil, such as stomatitis and diarrhea, have been described in two clinical studies when leucovorin, a form of folic acid, was administered with 5-fluorouracil (16845).

CAPECITABINE (Xeloda) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Use of high-dose folic acid might contribute to capecitabine toxicity.  Details Clinical research suggests that higher serum folate levels are associated with an increased risk for moderate or severe toxicity during capecitabine-based treatment for colorectal cancer (105402). Additionally, in one case report, taking folic acid 15 mg daily might have contributed to increased toxicity, including severe diarrhea, vomiting, edema, hand-foot syndrome, and eventually death, in a patient prescribed capecitabine (16837).

METHOTREXATE (Trexall, others) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Folic acid might reduce the efficacy of methotrexate as a cancer treatment when given concurrently.  Details Methotrexate exerts its cytotoxic effects by preventing conversion of folic acid to the active form needed by cells. There is some evidence that folic acid supplements reduce the efficacy of methotrexate in the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and theoretically they could reduce its efficacy in the treatment of other cancers (9420). Advise cancer patients to consult their oncologist before using folic acid supplements. In patients treated with long-term, low-dose methotrexate for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or psoriasis, folic acid supplements can reduce the incidence of side effects, without reducing efficacy (768,2162,4492,4493,4494,4546,9369).

PHENOBARBITAL (Luminal) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Folic acid might have antagonistic effects on phenobarbital and increase the risk for seizures.  Details Folic acid can have direct convulsant activity in some people, reversing the effects of phenobarbital and worsening seizure control (4427,9357,9358). Monitor closely for increased seizure activity.

PHENYTOIN (Dilantin) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Folic acid might reduce serum levels of phenytoin in some patients.  Details Folic acid may be a cofactor in phenytoin metabolism (4471). Folic acid, in doses of 1 mg daily or more, can reduce serum levels of phenytoin in some patients (4471,4477,4531,4536). Increases in seizure frequency have been reported. If folic acid supplements are added to established phenytoin therapy, monitor serum phenytoin levels closely. If phenytoin and folic acid are started at the same time and continued together, adverse changes in phenytoin pharmacokinetics are avoided (4471,4472,4473,4531). Note that phenytoin also reduces serum folate levels.

PRIMIDONE (Mysoline) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Folic acid might have antagonistic effects on primidone and increase the risk for seizures.  Details Folic acid can have direct convulsant activity in some people, reversing the effects of primidone and worsening seizure control (4427,9357,9358). Monitor closely for increased seizure activity. Note that primidone also reduces serum folate levels.

PYRIMETHAMINE (Daraprim) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Folic acid might antagonize the effects of pyrimethamine.  Details Folic acid can antagonize the antiparasitic effects of pyrimethamine against toxoplasmosis and Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia. Folic acid doesn't antagonize the effects of pyrimethamine in the treatment of malaria, because malarial parasites cannot use exogenous folic acid. Use folinic acid as an alternative to folic acid when indicated (9380).

(Read more about FOLIC ACID)

General ...Orally and intravenously, calcium is well-tolerated when used appropriately.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Belching, constipation, diarrhea, flatulence, and stomach upset.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Case reports have raised concerns about calciphylaxis and kidney stones.

Cardiovascular ...There has been concern that calcium intake may be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and coronary heart disease (CHD), including myocardial infarction (MI). Some clinical research suggests that calcium intake, often in amounts over the recommended daily intake level of 1000-1300 mg daily for adults, is associated with an increased risk of CVD, CHD, and MI (16118,17482,91350,107233). However, these results, particularly meta-analyses, have been criticized for excluding trials in which calcium was administered with vitamin D (94137). Many of these trials also only included postmenopausal females. Other analyses report conflicting results, and have not shown that calcium intake affects the risk of CVD, CHD, or MI (92994,93533,97308,107231). Reasons for these discrepancies are not entirely clear. It may relate to whether calcium is taken as monotherapy or in combination with vitamin D. When taken with vitamin D, which is commonly recommended, calcium supplementation does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of CVD, CHD, or MI (93533,107231). Also, the association between calcium supplementation and CVD, CHD, or MI risk may be influenced by the amount of calcium consumed as part of the diet. Supplementation with calcium may be associated with an increased risk of MI in people with dietary calcium intake above 805 mg daily, but not in those with dietary calcium intake below 805 mg daily (17482). To minimize the possible risk of CVD, CHD, or MI, advise patients not to consume more than the recommended daily intake of 1000-1200 mg and to consider total calcium intake from both dietary and supplemental sources (17484). While dietary intake of calcium is preferred over supplemental intake, advise patients who require calcium supplements to take calcium along with vitamin D, as this combination does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of MI (93533).
Rarely, calcium intake can increase the risk of calciphylaxis, which usually occurs in patients with kidney failure. Calciphylaxis is the deposition of calcium phosphate in arterioles, which causes skin ulcers and skin necrosis. In a case report, a 64-year-old female with a history of neck fracture, sepsis, and ischemic colitis presented with painful leg ulcers due to calciphylaxis. She discontinued calcium and vitamin D supplementation and was treated with sodium thiosulfate and supportive care (95816).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, calcium can cause belching, flatulence, nausea, gastrointestinal discomfort, and diarrhea (1824,1843,12950,38803). Although constipation is frequently cited as an adverse effect of calcium, there is no scientific substantiation of this side effect (1824,1843,1844,1845,12950,38978). Calcium carbonate has been reported to cause acid rebound, but this is controversial (12935,12936).

Oncologic ...There is some concern that very high doses of calcium might increase the risk of prostate cancer. Some epidemiological evidence suggests that consuming over 2000 mg/day of dietary calcium might increase the risk for prostate cancer (4825,12949). Additional research suggests that calcium intake over 1500 mg/day might increase the risk of advanced prostate cancer and prostate cancer mortality (14132). Consumption of dairy products has also been weakly linked to a small increase in prostate cancer risk (98894). However, contradictory research suggests no association between dietary intake of calcium and overall prostate cancer risk (14131,14132,104630). More evidence is needed to determine the effect of calcium, if any, on prostate cancer risk.

Renal ...Kidney stones have been reported in individuals taking calcium carbonate 1500 mg daily in combination with vitamin D 2000 IU daily for 4 years (93943).

(Read more about CALCIUM)

General ...Orally, folic acid is generally well-tolerated in amounts found in fortified foods, as well as in supplemental doses of less than 1 mg daily.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: At doses of 5 mg daily - abdominal cramps, diarrhea, and rash. At doses of 15 mg daily - bitter taste, confusion, hyperactivity, impaired judgment, irritability, nausea, sleep disturbances.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Cancer (long-term use), cardiovascular complications, liver injury, seizures.
All ROAs: Allergic reactions such as bronchospasm and anaphylactic shock.

Cardiovascular ...There is some concern that high oral doses of folic acid might increase the risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Clinical research shows that taking doses of 800 mcg to 1.2 mg/day might increase the risk of adverse cardiovascular events in patients with cardiovascular disease (12150,13482). High doses of folic acid might promote cell growth by providing large amounts of the biochemical precursors needed for cell replication. Overgrowth of cells in the vascular wall might increase the risk of occlusion (12150). Although some research suggests that use of folic acid might increase the need for coronary revascularization, analysis of multiple studies suggests that taking folic acid up to 5 mg/day for up to 24 months does not appear to affect coronary revascularization risk (90798).

Dermatologic ...Orally, folic acid 1-5 mg daily can cause rash (7225,90375,91319). Folic acid 15 mg daily can sometimes cause allergic skin reactions (15).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, folic acid 5 mg daily can cause abdominal cramps and diarrhea (7225). Folic acid 15 mg daily can sometimes cause nausea, abdominal distention, flatulence, and bitter taste in the mouth (15). In children aged 6-30 months at risk of malnourishment, taking a nutritional supplement (Nutriset Ltd) enriched in folic acid 75-150 mcg daily, with or without vitamin B 12 0.9-1.8 mcg daily, for 6 months increases the likelihood of having persistent diarrhea (90391).

Hepatic ...Liver dysfunction, with jaundice and very high liver enzymes, occurred in a 30-year-old pregnant patient with severe nausea and vomiting taking a folic acid supplement (Folic acid, Nature Made) 400 mcg daily. Based on the timing of ingestion, the lack of other etiological factors, a positive drug-induced lymphocyte stimulation test, and liver function normalization once the folic acid had been stopped, the authors suggest the folic acid supplement was the cause. However, the authors did not determine which substance in the folic acid supplement was responsible and therefore it cannot be determined that folic acid itself was the cause (91309).

Neurologic/CNS ...Orally, folic acid 15 mg daily can sometimes cause altered sleep patterns, vivid dreaming, irritability, excitability, hyperactivity, confusion, and impaired judgment (15). Large doses of folic acid can also precipitate or exacerbate neuropathy in people deficient in vitamin B12 (6243). Use of folic acid for undiagnosed anemia has masked the symptoms of pernicious anemia, resulting in lack of treatment and eventual neurological damage (15). Patients should be warned not to self-treat suspected anemia. There is also some concern that consuming high amounts of folic acid from the diet and/or supplements might worsen cognitive decline in older people. A large-scale study suggests that people over 65 years of age, who consume large amounts of folic acid (median of 742 mcg/day), have cognitive decline at a rate twice as fast as those consuming smaller amounts (median of 186 mcg/day). It's not known if this is directly attributable to folic acid. It is theorized that it could be due to folic acid masking a vitamin B12 deficiency. Vitamin B12 deficiency is associated with cognitive decline (13068). More evidence is needed to determine the significance of this finding. For now, suggest that most patients aim for the recommended folic acid intake of 400 mcg/day.

Oncologic ...There is some concern that high dose folic acid might increase the risk of cancer, although research is unclear and conflicting. A large-scale population study suggests that taking a multivitamin more than 7 times per week with a separate folic acid supplement significantly increased the risk of prostate cancer (15607). Clinical research also shows that taking folic acid 1 mg daily increase the absolute risk of prostate cancer by 6.4% over a 10-year period when compared with placebo. However, those with a higher baseline dietary intake of folic acid had a lower rate of prostate cancer, but this was not statistically significant. Also, folate and folic acid intake in patients with prostate cancer is not associated with the risk of prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy (91317). However, it is possible that discrepancies are due to dietary folate versus folic acid intake. Large analyses of population studies suggest that while dietary folate/folic acid is not associated with prostate cancer, high blood folate/folic acid increases the risk of prostate cancer (50411,91316).
Additional clinical research shows that taking folic acid 800 mcg daily, in combination with vitamin B12 400 mcg, significantly increases the risk of developing cancer, especially lung cancer, and all-cause mortality in patients with cardiovascular disease (17041). However, this may be due to vitamin B12, as other observational research found that higher vitamin B12 levels are linked with an increased risk for lung cancer (102383). Meta-analyses of large supplementation trials of folic acid at levels between 0.5-2.5 mg daily also suggest an increased risk of cancer (50497,110318). Also, in elderly individuals, taking folic acid 400 mcg daily with vitamin B12 500 mcg daily increased the risk of cancer. The risk was highest in individuals over 80 years of age and in females and mainly involved gastrointestinal and colorectal cancers (90393).
Not all researchers suspect that high intake of folic acid supplements might be harmful. Some research suggests that increased dietary intake of folic acid, along with other nutrients, might be protective against cancer (16822). A meta-analysis of multiple clinical trials suggests that folic acid supplementation studies with folic acid levels between 500 mcg to 50 mg/day does not increase the risk of general or site-specific cancer for up to 7 years (91312,91321). Also, a post-hoc subgroup analysis of results from clinical research in adults with a history of recent stroke or ischemic attack suggests that taking folic acid, vitamin B12, and vitamin B6 does not increase cancer risk overall, although it was associated with an increased risk of cancer in patients who also had diabetes (90378).

Psychiatric ...Orally, folic acid 15 mg daily can sometimes cause exacerbation of seizure frequency and psychotic behavior (15).

Pulmonary/Respiratory ...Folic acid use in late pregnancy has been associated with an increased risk of persistent and childhood asthma at 3. 5 years in population research (50380). When taken pre-pregnancy or early in pregnancy, population research has not found an association with increased risk of asthma or allergies in childhood (90799,103979). Folic acid use in pregnancy has been associated with a slightly increased risk of wheeze and lower respiratory tract infections up to 18 months of age in population research (50328).

(Read more about FOLIC ACID)